I have shot both. The k9 was a friends. To me the 9mm is a creampuff. That dense, well built piece of steel soaks up a lot of recoil, or at least that's how I perceive it. I've owned two k40's. One I regretfully sold. I just bought a used k40 Covert but I haven't been able to put it through its paces yet.
Small pistols chambered in 40 can be a handful, but the k40's weight tames it quite well. To me it certainly feels like there is more felt recoil but it's not painfully or uncomfortable to shoot. Used to put about 200 rounds down range with the k40 at every sessions and the only pain or discomfort I felt was from constantly reloading the magazines. The recoil of the k40 is something that I would described as "brisk and snappy".
Over the last 10 years I've put A LOT of .40 down range through various pistols, so I've become accustomed to its recoil. With that being said, it will be interesting to see how the recoil feels this weekend with its mk length grip.
I chose .40 because I'm used to it. If you like the 9 then use it. You won't be under armed, at least not because of the caliber.
Small pistols chambered in 40 can be a handful, but the k40's weight tames it quite well. To me it certainly feels like there is more felt recoil but it's not painfully or uncomfortable to shoot. Used to put about 200 rounds down range with the k40 at every sessions and the only pain or discomfort I felt was from constantly reloading the magazines. The recoil of the k40 is something that I would described as "brisk and snappy".
Over the last 10 years I've put A LOT of .40 down range through various pistols, so I've become accustomed to its recoil. With that being said, it will be interesting to see how the recoil feels this weekend with its mk length grip.
I chose .40 because I'm used to it. If you like the 9 then use it. You won't be under armed, at least not because of the caliber.

Comment