Goodbye P380!

[Cokeman]

Maybe Kahr should consider just replacing the gun in the beginning instead of having the customer spend time and money shipping a weapon back to the factory which should never have left there to begin with. A malfunctioning weapon is Kahr's problem and should not be the problem of the guy who laid out his hard earned cash. I don't blame any of these guys for dumping Kahr after what they've had to endure. Shouldn't happen. If Kahr had exchanged the problem weapon for one which ran like it should, they'd still have a loyal customer. You paid a premium price for their product and you deserve a gun which goes bang everytime, plain and simple. At least that's how I see it.

Seriously? Maybe car manufacturers should adopt this practice as well.

[Ed Carneal]

I am serious, but I believe an automobile has a few more moving parts than a Kahr. Not exactly the same thing. All they need do is produce a 600 dollar weapon which goes bang each time you pull the trigger. If they'd spend a bit more time with them at the factory, I'd think there'd be less problems and fewer unhappy customers.

[Scoundrel]

A lemon law regarding firearms might not be a bad thing. If it goes back more than three times for the same issue, then when it goes back the 4th time it gets replaced...

[Cokeman]

A lemon law regarding firearms might not be a bad thing. If it goes back more than three times for the same issue, then when it goes back the 4th time it gets replaced...

Yes.