Not real Happy with it but we will see!

I am not real happy with it sent it back to Kahr as the recoil spring would come out the hole in the front when it cycled. Jay said that the gun smith report would say what was wrong. It didn't when I got it back just said "replaced slide" OK well and good but what was wrong with it? What was machined wrong? Said test fired and they did but not much as it was not cleaned after firing. I email Jay so maybe Monday I will hear from him on what was wrong. I do notice the front sight is a little loose and can't be tighted, But three weeks at Kahr again is a pain. A drop of epoxy should fit it. Also two nicks in the new slide where the rear hatch is?
The CM9 was smaller than the Ruger LC9 so I bought the Kahr, the Nano just can out maybe those are better? I will get the Kahr to the range again and see what happens. If it still has issues it will continue to go back until they get it right or get tire of me and offer a buy back on it.

I am not real happy with it sent it back to Kahr as the recoil spring would come out the hole in the front when it cycled. Jay said that the gun smith report would say what was wrong. It didn't when I got it back just said "replaced slide" OK well and good but what was wrong with it? What was machined wrong? Said test fired and they did but not much as it was not cleaned after firing. I email Jay so maybe Monday I will hear from him on what was wrong. I do notice the front sight is a little loose and can't be tighted, But three weeks at Kahr again is a pain. A drop of epoxy should fit it. Also two nicks in the new slide where the rear hatch is?
The CM9 was smaller than the Ruger LC9 so I bought the Kahr, the Nano just can out maybe those are better? I will get the Kahr to the range again and see what happens. If it still has issues it will continue to go back until they get it right or get tire of me and offer a buy back on it.
Comment