This is not a gun bashing session. I was simply thinking about my PM40 and how it compared to the CW only from the perspective of size and capacity. I found that the PM offers the benefit of compactness with the 5 rd mag. However, with the 6 rd mag in the PM, both guns (PM and CW)offer the same capacity, grip size and the PM becomes similar in height to the CW. However, The PM is lighter and has a shorter barrel (length overall 5.47") vs the CW's (6.36" overall length). The added length (a little over 3/4") coupled with the slight increase in weight of the CW, might cause the CW to have slightly less felt recoil...but it may not be that perceptible in a 40.
Taking nothing away from the CW format....the PM has the benefit of the extended mag which allows it to cross over from a subcompact 5 rd mag capacity gun, to the slightly larger, yet compact size of the CW. I find that I use the extended mag much more during the winter months when I wear more clothing. For that matter, even a full size handgun could be easily concealed here in the north during the winter. However, once the weather warms, the PM's subcompact 5 rd mag is a nice CCW benefit.
Again, this is not intended as a gun bashing....just a simple comparison. They are both fine Kahr guns. It is just my 2 cents, as I was thinking on this today. Peace.
Taking nothing away from the CW format....the PM has the benefit of the extended mag which allows it to cross over from a subcompact 5 rd mag capacity gun, to the slightly larger, yet compact size of the CW. I find that I use the extended mag much more during the winter months when I wear more clothing. For that matter, even a full size handgun could be easily concealed here in the north during the winter. However, once the weather warms, the PM's subcompact 5 rd mag is a nice CCW benefit.
Again, this is not intended as a gun bashing....just a simple comparison. They are both fine Kahr guns. It is just my 2 cents, as I was thinking on this today. Peace.




Comment