Which would you rather own?

[mickeyfinn]

If you could only have one, which would you choose and why???

A. Brand new two tone CM9.

B. Older (Jan. 2006) PM9 with Black Diamond finish.

Both pistols feed, extract and shoot just fine.

[pbagley]

PM9. The CM9 will be used soon enough, and then the PM9 is going be worth more. Finish is just cosmetics, not a major difference to me.

[downtownv]

B.)

[ripley16]

PM9 because of the finish, polygonal barrel and sight selection, (dovetailed slide).

[AIRret]

pm9, it will hold it's value and ask Jocko…..you can shoot a Kahr forever.

[garyb]

Pm40

[hardluk1]

Guess I'll be the one to say the cm9 and spend the extra money on ammo to practice with or reloading supplies. I have both and honestly could care less about the finish , the barrels rifling or sights difference. I don't buy to sell so being worth when used more means nothing.

[340pd]

Hands down, the PM9

[RevRay]

I've become an all-metal fan, so if you're asking which I would spend money on, the answer is neither. But if someone were going to gift me one or the other, I would take the PM9. Like Pbagley said, the CM9 will be used soon enough, and then the PM9 will be worth more.

[TheTman]

PM9, for all the reasons mentioned.

[Rubb]

I believe PM9's have lost resale value because of the CM9.

[timmy]

Both

[leftysixty]

The same price for each? If the same I'd pick the PM. If not, the least expensive of the two.

[ROADWAR]

I'll splurge and take both. :001_tt2:

[ninjaturtl]

Another vote for the PM9.