25th Anniversary K9
25th Anniversary K9

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Watching the Osprey over Quantico

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Planedude View Post
    Some shorts of the BF-4 coming aboard the Wasp; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1wOJ9JImlRs



    How I see the jets, this is AA-1 the first (and only like her). The production jets were changed based on stuff we learned from the old girl. Note all the (#@$!*#) orange wire for test equipment; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eRtUGnw-GJY
    That not the way we came aboard in F-4's 40+ years ago.

    The F-35's are being built in Lookheed's plant in Texas as you know. The F-22's were built in Marietta, Ga. One of my dealers is just across the highway from the Plant in Marietta. Every Tuesday I spent 3 or 4 hours there and saw the F-22's fly three or four times every trip, always with an F-16 chase plane. I miss that since the production of the F-22's has finished.

    Comment


    • #17
      Me too, I built F-22 mid bodies thru ship 30 when they moved me to start-up the Japanese F-2 program.
      I sure hope the small buy of the F-22s don't bite some future admin in the rump cheek. I can't tell you how much of a bad boy the Raptor is (really I can't it's classified) and Lockhed is still fine tunning it to be tougher.

      Wow, has it really been 40 years since the F-4 was king...??? Dang that makes me feel old.
      I was once asked if I was "a paranoid for carrying my Kahr".
      "Nope" I said, "just prepared".
      " prepared for what" he asked?
      "more stuff than you are"
      God Bless our Troups!

      Comment


      • #18
        Are we selling F-22's to Japan?? That I didn't know. I still have friends in military aviation, so I probably know more about the capabilities of the F-22 than I should. I loved the way they used them last year as mini-Awac's in Alaska for the F-15's and no one even knew they were up there at 60,000 feet.

        You're not the one that used to paint them that awful pea green are you?

        If it makes you feel old what about me - I used to drive them.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Planedude View Post
          Yeah, redundant out the arse...
          The F-35 has three computers for fight control and each one of those has three channels that it runs, each backing up the other. Last time I checked we were running about 9.1 millon lines of code and puting more in every day...

          Our autos are following suit.

          Some shorts of the BF-4 coming aboard the Wasp; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1wOJ9JImlRs

          How I see the jets, this is AA-1 the first (and only like her). The production jets were changed based on stuff we learned from the old girl. Note all the (#@$!*#) orange wire for test equipment; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eRtUGnw-GJY
          Yes, and on average there are 2.5 bugs per 1,000 lines of code. So that is 22,500 bugs in that 9M LoC bird.

          That is how the Chinese get into everything and suck our intelectual property out. No telling what they leave behind.

          Next time you are on a Boeing or Airbus, ask yourself how many LoC there are in that bird.

          Carl
          Kahr MK9, PM9
          Colt Combat Commander .45
          Kimber Pro II .45

          Comment


          • #20
            [QUOTE=steveschu;186281]That old bird has been around since the 80's......how about the F-35???

            Try the late 60's, they just couldn't get a bite on the design until the '80s. Here's the killer. Take a good look at the pic. Plane takes off with the engines pointed up and at a certin altitude they turn 90 deg. forword and you have a plane, much faster than a copter. But if the plane takes hits or the hydralics get damadged when the engines are forword you are up a creek with worse than no paddle. If the engines can't revert to the takeoff position as shown in the pics and are stuck "down" in plane mode a landing means much of the prop protrudes below the wheels. The blades then hit the ground, break up and enter the fusealoge. Take a good look at the pics and the prop length and tell me you you want your loved ones in this plane.

            Bring back the A-10's and let's get to work!!!!!!

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by O'Dell View Post
              Are we selling F-22's to Japan?? That I didn't know. I still have friends in military aviation, so I probably know more about the capabilities of the F-22 than I should. I loved the way they used them last year as mini-Awac's in Alaska for the F-15's and no one even knew they were up there at 60,000 feet.
              Nawww, cause that would have made tooo much sense! The Japanese, at first, demanded that they co-produce the F-22 and do their own final assembly (national pride thing). The current admin refused and we lost the F-22 sales. Once the Japanese relized we were dead flat serious they agreed to buy a decent number of them right off the Georgia assembly line in what ever verison we would sell them. Obumma refused and ended F-22 production at ship 189. Japan finally offered to buy the USAF several F-22s in an effort to keep the production line open till the Japanese aircraft could be started. Again the offer was refused, but they will allow the Japanese to buy F-35s...
              The nutty part here is the F-35 is in several ways more advanced then the F-22 and we will be adding the F-35 tech into our F-22 fleet.

              Anybody want to guess where we station a large part of our F-22s to keep an eye on China? Would have been good for everyone to just sell the Japanese their very own F-22s and it would have kept alot of Americans working in good paying production jobs. Sigh, Obumma, freind of the union working man... at least thats what my Union keeps telling me (and we keep telling them, NOT!!)

              Soap box dismount. The F-2 was Japans re-engg-ineared F-16. They feature a longer fuselage, hardened wind screen (sea bird strikes) and larger all composite wings. Those wings are some-thing-else to build... The re-design was all about performance with the Japans aint-ship missles, real big monsters.
              Japan had to halt their production as the F-2s were costing almost as much as we spent on F-22s each... It is possible to overthink a problem.

              Oh and Shhhhhhhh! don't give away too much neat F-22 info...
              Attached Files
              I was once asked if I was "a paranoid for carrying my Kahr".
              "Nope" I said, "just prepared".
              " prepared for what" he asked?
              "more stuff than you are"
              God Bless our Troups!

              Comment


              • #22
                They need to bring the alien flying saucer anti-gravity technology out of hiding!
                Very interesting...

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Planedude View Post



                  Soap box dismount. The F-2 was Japans re-engg-ineared F-16. They feature a longer fuselage, hardened wind screen (sea bird strikes) and larger all composite wings. Those wings are some-thing-else to build... The re-design was all about performance with the Japans aint-ship missles, real big monsters.
                  Japan had to halt their production as the F-2s were costing almost as much as we spent on F-22s each... It is possible to overthink a problem.

                  Oh and Shhhhhhhh! don't give away too much neat F-22 info...
                  When you said F-2 I thought you left off a 2. Didn't the Japanese have an F-2 several years ago? I know they had an F-1.

                  Since you didn't answer, I assume you wielded the pea-green spray gun.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by JFootin View Post
                    They need to bring the alien flying saucer anti-gravity technology out of hiding!
                    You've been listening to Bob Lazar, haven't you?

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X