Armed March on DC

[knkali]

got my T hat on. That could be a possibility. OR they would use it for their agenda at a minimum.

[ltxi]

]I do not want to be around 900 people I don't know with loaded weapons.[/B] I've had enough guns pointed at me at trap and sporting clay shoots, people looking at other folks' shotguns and stuff, that although I'm sure (or sure hope) they were unloaded, I still hate some idiot covering me with their barrel.
I can just imagine someone fooling around, and setting off a negligent discharge, and all hell breaking loose. This is just going to fuel the "gun nut" hysteria of the left, and god forbid an accident happen, it could really hurt the cause. If they want to march with guns, leave the ammo home, and remove the bolts from the guns at least. And I don't like that prospect much either.

Afghanistan, Iraq, Texas, Mexico.....

[pappy42]

I just wonder if this was cooked up by someone working undercover for BO, because this sure would be a tool he could use to destroy our 2A rights - a whole mob of people illegally carrying loaded guns!

It would probably be those pesky FBI agents; right Bawanna?

[Bawanna]

It would probably be those pesky FBI agents; right Bawanna?

I threw away all my paint brushes, especially the broad ones. I got no way of telling now.

[MD_Vet]

followup article...



http://www.thedailysheeple.com/d-c-p...testers_052013

[knkali]

wow what a thread

[downtownv]

I'll watch it on TV.... seems like a good way to lose your CCL.

[Fxstchewy]

I think i will sit this one out......

[pappy42]

I don't see this ending well.

[dkmatthews]

I was "invited" and almost didn't catch the whole point that it's an armed march. That's where it crosses the line from civil disobedience into abject stupidity.

[knkali]

I understand that another group that is unarmed is marching behind them. Does anyone have any info on this group?

[TheTman]

I think it's all the same group, just the people that don't want to pack will be put in the rear of the march.

With everything that is going on, the Benghazi hearings, and the birthers getting their day in court, I am really worried that Obama and crew, will take this as an opportunity for a show of force and a mass execution or something else outrageous. I think the marchers expect to be arrested, and have said as much, but say a shot rings out from somewhere, that may be enough to trigger some armed confrontation, and I don't want to be in the middle of what might go down should something like that happen. How will the nation react if 900 some people are slaughtered? This could have some unforeseen consequences, and I do wish they'd reconsider the ARMED part. Or at the very least, remove the ammo and bolts from the weapons, and have each and every marcher safety checked by a Virginia State Trooper before they join the march. Even that will not guarantee that some idiot doesn't load his rifle and put the bolt in, unless they keep a very close eye on the marchers. I just have a bad feeling about this. Even Alex Jones is leery of this, although he is going to be there, unarmed, to cover the story. Maybe we'll get lucky and not enough will show up. The organizer says if at least 900 people don't show, he's not going to go through with it. So many people have expessed doubts about this, It's just that the organizer, Adam Kokesh, will not be dissuaded. He has said that if 10,000 people don't RSVP to march, that he will cancel the event, and so far less than 1000 have RSVP'd so maybe there is a chance it won't go down.
I think if they'd do a 10,000 man UNARMED march, they'd get the point across, probably have a better turnout, and have a much smaller chance of something going wrong. I just figure with that many people with rifles, there's going to be a lot of "wow, that's a cool rifle, can I take a look at it?" And a negligent discharge could happen. Not to mention some looney deciding that this is a good time to set off a round, maybe the DC cops are being too brutal in his eyes or some kind of crap like that. All it would take is one shot ringing out, for things to get out of hand in a hurry. Or hell, some kid decides to throw a string of firecrackers into the crowd. I bet the police are going to be on edge, and won't take much to set them off. Mr. Kokesh better have all this thought out, and plans on what to do if something strange happens.

[downtownv]

I think it's all the same group, just the people that don't want to pack will be put in the rear of the march.

With everything that is going on, the Benghazi hearings, and the birthers getting their day in court, I am really worried that Obama and crew, will take this as an opportunity for a show of force and a mass execution or something else outrageous. I think the marchers expect to be arrested, and have said as much, but say a shot rings out from somewhere, that may be enough to trigger some armed confrontation, and I don't want to be in the middle of what might go down should something like that happen. How will the nation react if 900 some people are slaughtered? This could have some unforeseen consequences, and I do wish they'd reconsider the ARMED part. Or at the very least, remove the ammo and bolts from the weapons, and have each and every marcher safety checked by a Virginia State Trooper before they join the march. Even that will not guarantee that some idiot doesn't load his rifle and put the bolt in, unless they keep a very close eye on the marchers. I just have a bad feeling about this. Even Alex Jones is leery of this, although he is going to be there, unarmed, to cover the story. Maybe we'll get lucky and not enough will show up. The organizer says if at least 900 people don't show, he's not going to go through with it. So many people have expessed doubts about this, It's just that the organizer, Adam Kokesh, will not be dissuaded. He has said that if 10,000 people don't RSVP to march, that he will cancel the event, and so far less than 1000 have RSVP'd so maybe there is a chance it won't go down.
I think if they'd do a 10,000 man UNARMED march, they'd get the point across, probably have a better turnout, and have a much smaller chance of something going wrong. I just figure with that many people with rifles, there's going to be a lot of "wow, that's a cool rifle, can I take a look at it?" And a negligent discharge could happen. Not to mention some looney deciding that this is a good time to set off a round, maybe the DC cops are being too brutal in his eyes or some kind of crap like that. All it would take is one shot ringing out, for things to get out of hand in a hurry. Or hell, some kid decides to throw a string of firecrackers into the crowd. I bet the police are going to be on edge, and won't take much to set them off. Mr. Kokesh better have all this thought out, and plans on what to do if something strange happens.

Or 10,00 march with exposed empty holsters.....

[knkali]

Or 10,00 march with exposed empty holsters.....

if 10k show w empty holsters, that would more effective than 2-3k with guns

[JohnR]

I just wonder if this was cooked up by someone working undercover for BO, because this sure would be a tool he could use to destroy our 2A rights - a whole mob of people illegally carrying loaded guns!

You're not alone. However, the guy in this link claims that Washington DC is a Virginia corporation owned by the queen, who is owned by the Vatican, which is owned by the Rothschilds.