CC experts sometimes observe that it's easier to conceal a pistol with a longer barrel than with a longer handle. Grant Cunningham made that point in his book, for example. Some companies even started making guns with such a profile. In particular Sprigfield issued longer barrel options for XD-S and EMP. And of course Glock did it from the start with Glock 36 and Glock 42. Having used those, it seems disadvantageous that Kahr guns are always "square": if you want a longer barrel, you have to put up with a longer grip.
Note that in a .45 Kahr, you cannot just put a longer slide on top of a shorter frame, because the frame has lower rails at the front that the very tip of the slide rides. So, how about the opposite? Start with CW45, then lop off just enough of the handle so the magazine of PM45 fits exactly. The only downside that I see is the resale value hit. But is there a problem that I do not foresee?
Note that in a .45 Kahr, you cannot just put a longer slide on top of a shorter frame, because the frame has lower rails at the front that the very tip of the slide rides. So, how about the opposite? Start with CW45, then lop off just enough of the handle so the magazine of PM45 fits exactly. The only downside that I see is the resale value hit. But is there a problem that I do not foresee?



Comment