Another gun devalued

[Bawanna]

theory is that it tightens up the cylinder crane. In theory it probalby does, in reality it seems to make no difference. I think Ruger turns right to.

politicaly maybe the owners were liberals!!!!! and was sending us sumliminal messages..:19:

ol jocko's theory:. Due to the Coriolis Effect, revolver cylinders rotate counterclockwise in the northern hemisphere and clockwise in the southern hemisphere, just like cyclones and toilet drains. Just sayin

A friend sent this to me

What just happened?

[getsome]

Ok I'll bite why does it turn right?...I know S&W made theirs turn left to avoid patent infringement and to just be different from Colt...

[Tinman507]

[O'Dell]

What just happened?

I don't know, but suddenly I'm very afraid!

[O'Dell]

Take it from me Bawanna, hair is highly over rated.

Maybe so, but mine is getting a bit thin on top, so if you want to send some extra south to Atlanta, I'll risk it.

[jg rider]

theory is that it tightens up the cylinder crane. In theory it probalby does, in reality it seems to make no difference. I think Ruger turns right to.

politicaly maybe the owners were liberals!!!!! and was sending us sumliminal messages..:19:

ol jocko's theory:. Due to the Coriolis Effect, revolver cylinders rotate counterclockwise in the northern hemisphere and clockwise in the southern hemisphere, just like cyclones and toilet drains. Just sayin

A friend sent this to me

That's part of it. The rest is the pawl / hand rotates the cylinder by way of the star ratchet, and when the bolt drops into the cylinder slot the pawl still applies pressure against the ratchet to hold the cylinder rigid. There isn't any side to side cylinder play when you hold the trigger back.

Not like a S&W, whose hand rotates the cylinder until the bolt drops into the cylinder slot and then the hand drops away so there's side to side cylinder play when you hold the the trigger back

Colt timing is so much more critical. And you're right, as far as I know there was no difference in accuracy

Another quirk with Colts was it's .357 caliber bore diameter. As far as I know all other .38 / .357 calibers have a bore diameter of .357" / .358". Not Colt, it's diameter was .356". I had to be aware of that because of leading, I cast my own bullets.

I don't know what the effect is called, (Coriolis Effect) but it does effect trigger pull. Shooting a Colt while facing north will allow the earth's rotation to help rotate the cylinder for a lighter trigger pull.
Face south for all others

[getsome]

Thanks jg, I thought it was something like that....Man even though I'm a S&W guy I would give up one of the boys to get my hands on a Python...Every time I watch the movie "Magnum Force" and see the bad cops shooting those beautiful 4" blued Pythons it makes my britches stick out in the front...They are rare as frog hair now and cost more than a house if you can find one...

I wonder what things we have around today that in 30 years we will look back and kick ourselves for not buying a crate load of and putting away...Probably not much as things today seem to be of the use up and throw away variety...

A couple range trips ago a younger guy brought in what looked like a new in the original box blued Colt .38 Detective Special that didn't have a pawl ring around the cylinder so it may have never been c0cked or the cylinder opened...The guy said he got it from his grandfathers estate when he died and wanted to trade it for a semi auto pistol of some kind...The counter guy started drooling but another guy looking at guns saw it and started pulling out 100 dollar bills and handing them to the guy...The young man didn't have any idea how much the .38 was worth and I only wish I had some money on me that day...That was a beautiful pristine revolver...

[jocko]

yup I lost a million dollars on guns about 30 years ago. Guns I could have bought then for peanuts and sold today for millions. Hindsight is always 20-20. I wish I had my brother 57 chevy 2dr belair (new in 57 I think around $2200)...Yup lost that one to.