A New Low

[muggsy]

"The One" is now denying death benefits to the families of our fallen military due to the government shutdown. I wonder if his family will receive benefits if he falls?

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/09/us...lies.html?_r=0

[Longitude Zero]

That tyrannical subhumanoid puke is bound and determined to get his way by throwing his tantrums. I hope the conservatives do not cave in to his antics.

[muggsy]

That tyrannical subhumanoid puke is bound and determined to get his way by throwing his tantrums. I hope the conservatives do not cave in to his antics.

I remind them daily not to cave.

[Chief Joseph]

And once again I refer to my post of why would anyone serve now.

[muggsy]

For love of country and freedom. You don't stop being an American, because we have an ashole for a president.

[knkali]

the benefits have been reinstituted. It was on the news this afternoon.
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013...n-is-over?lite

[Armybrat]

Whoever made the decision to order those death benefits to be delayed needs to be fired and their pension revoked.

[JohnR]

For love of country and freedom. You don't stop being an American, because we have an ashole for a president.

So does one enlist for the purpose of overthrowing one's commander in chief?

Clinton was president when I went in, that didn't bother me. The current POS bothers me. I would not consider enlisting with him as my commander in chief.

I've head these decisions are made at the Office of Management and Budget, which is a Presidential cabinet position. Therefore, it's Obama who's responsible for these decisions and yes he should be fired.

[muggsy]

So does one enlist for the purpose of overthrowing one's commander in chief?

Clinton was president when I went in, that didn't bother me. The current POS bothers me. I would not consider enlisting with him as my commander in chief.

I've head these decisions are made at the Office of Management and Budget, which is a Presidential cabinet position. Therefore, it's Obama who's responsible for these decisions and yes he should be fired.

John, I don't understand your question. One joins the military to serve his country. It has nothing to do with who resides in the oval office. If everyone left the military because they didn't like the C-in-C the country would be militarily defenseless. With the possible exception of Bawanna, no one dislikes the SOB currently residing in the White House than I do, but that wouldn't stop me from joining the military to protect my country. I guess that I'm just a true patriot.

[JohnR]

John, I don't understand your question. One joins the military to serve his country. It has nothing to do with who resides in the oval office. If everyone left the military because they didn't like the C-in-C the country would be militarily defenseless. With the possible exception of Bawanna, no one dislikes the SOB currently residing in the White House than I do, but that wouldn't stop me from joining the military to protect my country. I guess that I'm just a true patriot.

I guess I'm responding to the idea of joining the military to fight for freedom against all enemies foreign and domestic, and that the current oval orifice occupant is the enemy of freedom.