Tweet
Ukraine: The Endgame
March 7, 2014 by Jon Rappoport
On one level, the struggle over Ukraine is a deadly U.S./EU/Russian game of territory, involving governments, intelligence agencies, corporations and banks.
But at a higher level, as usual, sit the elite globalist players. And their motives are different. They see every conflict as an opportunity to negotiate the aftermath.
And that negotiation produces a codified structure of cooperation between the enemies that is larger than the previous structure.
For example, there were banks and corporations (Standard Oil, ITT, IBM, etc.) who were aiding both sides in World War II. And in the aftermath, a much larger market for goods (Europe, U.S.) was created.
The U.S. government, in its European rebuilding efforts, made sure of that.
Post-World War II, Europe itself started on the road toward creating the current European Union, which is a vast bureaucracy that sits over the entire continent.
This is the globalist principle: Instigate conflicts in order to build larger cooperative structures in the aftermath. And control those cooperative structures.
That way, you put more people, land, resources and labor under the umbrella.
There is only one exception. If either of the conflicting parties, in the aftermath, refuses to build those cooperative bridges, the globalist scheme doesn’t work.
So, vis-à-vis the Ukraine conflict, if Russia or the Unites States, in the aftermath, says no to building new cooperative structures (either out in the open or behind closed doors), that “defector” is now a globalist target for further chaos and destabilization — until it relents and joins the club.
Above the saber rattling, angry accusations and characterizations of “a new Cold War,” Ukraine is a pawn in the globalist game of bringing Russian and U.S. power players into closer accord — kicking and screaming, if necessary.
In accord, but not in a good way. In a globalist way.
Because the globalist agenda is a planet of one nation, where all borders are ultimately erased; and the ruling class of money, corporate power and political torque is enthroned.
This program is neither left nor right. It hides behind exacerbated conflict between left and right.
It engenders a reality in which left versus right appears to be the only political game in town.
But it isn’t the only game.
You could call the globalist agenda socialism, communism, fascism, corporatism, liberal, conservative and other names. And each one of those names would contain a kernel of truth. But in fact, globalism is simply control from above. Period.
Yes, there must be certain issues on which the left and right disagree. There must be differences. And these issues must be hot — hot enough to rally supporters who scream at each other across the barricades.
Because that is the kind of distraction globalism needs to do its methodical work in secret.
If Ukraine follows the blueprint, at the end of the conflict, the U.S. and Russia will be seething at each other. And then, a mediating figure will appear, perhaps from the Rockefeller camp.
And in a private meeting, he will say, “Boys, cool down. We have a plan. And in this plan, everybody wins. You’ll all go home with something. Look. Look at this. And this. And this.”
The peacemaker.
http://personalliberty.com/2014/03/0...e-the-endgame/
March 7, 2014 by Jon Rappoport
On one level, the struggle over Ukraine is a deadly U.S./EU/Russian game of territory, involving governments, intelligence agencies, corporations and banks.
But at a higher level, as usual, sit the elite globalist players. And their motives are different. They see every conflict as an opportunity to negotiate the aftermath.
And that negotiation produces a codified structure of cooperation between the enemies that is larger than the previous structure.
For example, there were banks and corporations (Standard Oil, ITT, IBM, etc.) who were aiding both sides in World War II. And in the aftermath, a much larger market for goods (Europe, U.S.) was created.
The U.S. government, in its European rebuilding efforts, made sure of that.
Post-World War II, Europe itself started on the road toward creating the current European Union, which is a vast bureaucracy that sits over the entire continent.
This is the globalist principle: Instigate conflicts in order to build larger cooperative structures in the aftermath. And control those cooperative structures.
That way, you put more people, land, resources and labor under the umbrella.
There is only one exception. If either of the conflicting parties, in the aftermath, refuses to build those cooperative bridges, the globalist scheme doesn’t work.
So, vis-à-vis the Ukraine conflict, if Russia or the Unites States, in the aftermath, says no to building new cooperative structures (either out in the open or behind closed doors), that “defector” is now a globalist target for further chaos and destabilization — until it relents and joins the club.
Above the saber rattling, angry accusations and characterizations of “a new Cold War,” Ukraine is a pawn in the globalist game of bringing Russian and U.S. power players into closer accord — kicking and screaming, if necessary.
In accord, but not in a good way. In a globalist way.
Because the globalist agenda is a planet of one nation, where all borders are ultimately erased; and the ruling class of money, corporate power and political torque is enthroned.
This program is neither left nor right. It hides behind exacerbated conflict between left and right.
It engenders a reality in which left versus right appears to be the only political game in town.
But it isn’t the only game.
You could call the globalist agenda socialism, communism, fascism, corporatism, liberal, conservative and other names. And each one of those names would contain a kernel of truth. But in fact, globalism is simply control from above. Period.
Yes, there must be certain issues on which the left and right disagree. There must be differences. And these issues must be hot — hot enough to rally supporters who scream at each other across the barricades.
Because that is the kind of distraction globalism needs to do its methodical work in secret.
If Ukraine follows the blueprint, at the end of the conflict, the U.S. and Russia will be seething at each other. And then, a mediating figure will appear, perhaps from the Rockefeller camp.
And in a private meeting, he will say, “Boys, cool down. We have a plan. And in this plan, everybody wins. You’ll all go home with something. Look. Look at this. And this. And this.”
The peacemaker.
http://personalliberty.com/2014/03/0...e-the-endgame/
Comment