Who exactly, is Loretta Lynch ???

[downtownv]

Who exactly, is Loretta Lynch ???

Remember -- Loretta Lynch, Obama’s pick for Attorney-General

Curious circumstances, if that? Hmmmm!

They have started investigating Loretta Lynch, Obama’s pick for Attorney-General and immediately they could see an interesting and unnerving connection. It appears that when Loretta Lynch started Harvard, she co-founded an African-American only sorority. There was only one other girl in this sorority, Sharon Malone. The name rings a bell...

The name of the wife of the current, corrupt AG, Eric Holder, is Sharon Malone; and she is the sister of a known civil rights activist leader Vivien Malone –Jones (one of 2 black students who enrolled in the all white University of Alabama).

They checked the age: both were born in 1959 and both went to Harvard at the same time. There were very few African-American students in Harvard in 1977-1981, so it is rather certain that Loretta Lynch is an old college friend of Sharon Malone, the wife of the current AG, Eric Holder!!

Why is this connection important? Holder will inevitably be investigated by Congress for totally lawless gun-trafficking to Mexican drug cartels in Fast and Furious, the IRS scandal, the VA scandal, the DOJ, NSA, EPA, FEC and other scandals. Most importantly, AG Holder covered up Obama’s use of a stolen CT Social Security number (Harrison J. Bounel 042-68-4425) and Obama’s use of several different bogus IDs.

It seems that a long time college friend of Holder’s wife was picked up as a gate-keeper by Obama to continue all of the cover up actions by Holder and, MOST IMPORTANTLY, to shield Holder and Obama from criminal prosecution.

snopes.com: Loretta Lynch, Sharon Malone Connection

Gotta Love these slimy weasels....

[muggsy]

No surprises here.

[Scarywoody]

Another racist choice from the Obama Administration. Not surprised.

[Ikeo74]

I am waiting to see what religion his picks are.......wouldn't be surprised if they are Muslim, or at least Pro Muslim. I expect the prez to do a fake conversion when he leaves office. Is he hiding his "real" religion?

[JohnR]

Their religion is most likely Black Liberation Theology, i.e. Marxist.

I'm impressed that Snopes chose not to lie about this.

[marshal kane]

There are more foxes in the hen house than there are hens. Not surprising when charisma and charm is all it takes to sway almost an entire nation's votes. While I don't like Prof. Gruber (IMO, he's such a weasel) the man is right when it comes to a large segment of the voters.

[muggsy]

Hell, and I thought that Loretta Lynch was one of them thar country and western singers. Tarnation!

[deadeye]

I'm sure surprised. I really expected Sarah Palin to get the nod. They can't find anyone to replace Hagel so far. Maybe Monica?

[downtownv]

ERIC HOLDER’S REPLACEMENT’S TROUBLING PAST

President Obama has a knack for picking embattled, and often times, devious members for his cabinet. And while Eric Holder’s replacement, Loretta Lynch, doesn’t have a criminal past… it certainly isn’t spotless.
Loretta Lynch served as an advisor to Holder while he was Obama’s AG. So, if you want any idea of what’s to come, you’ve already seen her malfeasance in action.
Basically, she’s Holder 2.0.
On voter ID, she is all for stopping the requirements of Voter IDs being presented at the time a vote is cast.
Lynch believes in some odd, twisted way, that requiring voters to present ID at the booth is somehow chopping MLK Jr. off at the knees. She claims that state legislators, like those in North Carolina, were trying to reverse MLK Jr.’s influence when they tried to enforce such laws.
She has indicated that any further action at the state level will be met with continued federal lawsuits.
Another area where Lynch is fairly loose is in regard to the death penalty. Lynch is trying to stop the death penalty altogether. The reasons for it are fitting for an Obama appointee.
As The Daily Signal writes:

Lynch also apparently views the death penalty as racist. She is cited as saying in a 2002 roundtable discussion that she had to repeatedly ‘explain decisions not to seek the [death] penalty’ when she was a prosecutor. She claimed that the relative ease with which the death penalty was applied against blacks and Hispanics suggested a systematic disregard for minority citizens.
Lynch would not apply the death penalty even if all of the ‘problems’ with it could be fixed, according to the article, simply because of its supposed disparate impact on minorities: ‘You can be as fair as possible in a particular case, but the reality is that the federal death penalty is going to hit harder on certain groups.’

Lynch will undoubtedly use the office to push Obama’s agenda. She’ll use her role as AG to move progressive politics forward rather than working to execute justice.
That’s what Holder has done before her.
Lynch’s past is loaded with decisions that seriously undermine the authority of the constitution as it pertains to the operation of government.
While she should be concerned about fulfilling her role as the supreme prosecutor, and staying faithful to real justice, it looks like she’ll do nothing more than demure to her bosses’ wishes.
And some of those wishes will likely come at your expense, of course.
Don’t let your freedoms be ruined by Lynch and company. Exercise freedom wherever you can. Especially when it comes to keeping more money out of their grubby hands.

[JohnR]

What's their goal? Affirmative action in criminal arrests? Racial quotas in prosecutions? Arrest more whites even if no crime occured (Ferguson), and arrest fewer minorities even if crimes do occur (illegal immigration)?

Hmm, maybe I answered my own question.