I need help with this one

[AJBert]

I'm putting this under Politics because I'm pretty sure this may turn into a 1st Amendment case if it goes that far:

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/12/17...cmp=latestnews

My problem is the three members of the city council state that the shirts are divisive. DIVISIVE?!? I see it as really good advice to anyone who may be questioning their moral compass on whether to mug that old lady or steal some Swisher Sweets or resist arrest.

Help me out guys, I need to get my head straight on this.

[JohnR]

He owns the T-shirt store, the council can piss up a rope.

[deadeye]

Depends on how you look at it. From your eyes - or a radical left wing socialist (Ovomit's bunch.) If you are the latter who is trying to destroy the country as we know it, then it is indeed "DIVISIVE." If the killing should stop or things settle down what will Holder, Jackson and especially Sharpton do to survive?

[knkali]

I think the t shirts were in poor taste and inflammatory but he should be protected by the 1A just like anyone else.

[b4uqzme]

^^^ yes. And I think the Notre Dame shirts were in poor taste and inflammatory too (but protected by the 1a).

[muggsy]

Did you notice how the story tried to promote a false narrative? The black man didn't die because of a choke hold. He died of heart failure, because he broke the law and resisted arrest.

[JohnR]

And according to what I read, he died in the hospital, not at the scene of his arrest.

[muggsy]

You read it right, John. That's exactly what happened.

[AJBert]

Wish I could order three of them before I head out to MO for Christmas on Monday. One for me, one for my daughter and one for my son-in-law.