25th Anniversary K9
25th Anniversary K9

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Kim Davis Jailed Over Her Religious Beliefs

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    I've been set in the corner many times over the years for my position on where religious rights and civil rights meet. As a Christian I understand the founding basis and beliefs of the founders. That they wrote in principle that there will not be a state based religion everybody cheers. However that also opens the tent flap for a herd of camels with opposing religious beliefs, some of which affects how they live their daily life.

    As our country has devolved into an overriding lack of "Christian Morality" many have been aghast but without a solid means of push back just went along. You don't have to visit the coliseum and see the gladiators but have no means to prevent it.

    So, this sadly brings me to my point. I was not opposed to stopping school prayer (gasp) only because if it cannot be a Christian prayer I don't want my heritage to be exposed. If continued, today we would likely have a Muslim prayer day where everybody would kneel and bow on a mat and recite their ritual. Then another religion would have their day, etc. My opinion is I'd rather have a sincere family prayer time in my faith which would bring family together and generate tradition than the alternative. I wonder how many school children only had prayer time at school and occasionally at meals. These same parents protesting outlawing school prayer - shameful.

    Extend this premise to other incidents. Remember the fracas over grammar school Shiite kids wearing their ceremonial knives to school on religious principal? There's many examples but we have to come to a point where religious public practices (all religions or no religion) don't interfere with civil practices.

    I find many practices allowed in civil discourse very distasteful however the place to express that belief is not where the tickets are sold but way back up the chain. You have to be aware of the policies when you take a job. How many times has the discussion here been around an employee's right to carry a concealed weapon on the job when in violation of company policy. Sometime individual rights are subjected to employer rights although you retain your individual right to choose your place of employment.

    I believe it is a citizens responsibility to consider the ways of camels when taking a stand. If your camel is in the tent how can you not allow other camels. Everyone needs to consider the possibilities of unintended consequences when it comes to policy.
    •"Everything will be okay in the end. If it's not okay, it's not the end." - O. L.
    • "America's not at war; her military is. America's at the mall."

    Comment


    • #17
      If families lived and practiced Christian values at home, their absence in public places wouldn't leave a void to be filled by all the wackos.

      We've destroyed the family, undermined its authority, and replaced it with TV, the internet, and government handouts. What other outcome would we expect?

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by DanTana View Post
        What about her 1st amendment rights? I bet if she were Muslim she'd still be doing her job today.
        She doesn't have the right of preventing the citizens from getting govt approval of that which is deemed legal by the govt or of forcing them to go to the next county to get it. She could have allowed her underlings to issue the permits but she chose not to.

        Comment


        • #19
          Heard a true story that happened a while back. Fellow rode his horse up to the courthouse. Walked in, asked clerk for marriage license certificate. She thinkingly, but calmly, began writing out the info. Came to the question "How old is the wife to be". "7 years of age" was the reply. Answer: By State law She will need parental consent.

          Comment


          • #20
            http://www.caintv.com/if-kim-davis-is-in-jail-for-no

            she's not in jail for her job performance. She's in jail for "contempt of court," stemming from her refusal to obey a court order. The distinction is important because the court order is not based on any statute passed by a state legislature or by Congress. It is based on the decision of one court (the Supreme one) to institute a nationwide right not listed in the Constitution nor established by any act of Congress, and on the decision of another court to order her to personally participate in the fulfillment of that right.

            Comment


            • #21
              Judge Orders Kim Davis Immediate Release

              http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/jud...ase/ar-AAe4vN4

              Comment

              Working...
              X