Somebody explain Mali response....

[CJB]

How is it, we could not get anyone to an active attack in Benghazi, Libya, when US Embassy folks were getting attack, yet, we get over 50 US Special Forces to a hotel in Bamako, Mali within half an hour.

Somebody explain this to me, because according to the map, Bamako (Obamako?) is a good deal west of BFE, while Libya ain't so terribly far from things.

Another thing.... how is it, Clinton and Co., at the State Dept said... "There wasn't time!" (to send forces to the Embassy)? Did they know how long the attack was going to last?

Somebody explain.

[downtownv]

Mali has real Africans.
Libya has Arab Africans, is all I can think of.

[TheTman]

Ambassador Stevens knew about the weapon shipments from Libya to the Syrian rebels through Turkey, and was going to spill the beans. Therefore he had to be taken out. Obama and Hillary basically killed him to protect their "secret". That's the best explanation I've run across. Officers who were going to ignore the Stand Down order and send troops or planes, were relieved of their commands by conveniently placed CIA operatives acting as their 2nd in command. No one wants to believe that our government would stoop that low, but what are 4 deaths to people that are responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands. Just more Globalist activity courtesy of the puppets in powerful places. I don't believe this administration or the CIA has any loyalty to the American people, the military, or anyone except their puppet masters. The same old culprits, Globalist Banksters, the Illuminati, the New World Order bunch, and those who want to see this country brought down, and assimilated into a global society.

[OldLincoln]

I'll just say that IMHO it's a matter of public opinion exposure. Not a good time to plead plausible deniability as public is already sensitized (plus elections getting close).