A message from Rand Paul

[JFootin]

Scary thing is, though, when they do take over history tells us that they will round up and kill, or starve to death, millions in order to establish their objectives. Look at the history of the Soviet Union and China. In fact, they think that for the sake of the environment and preservation of natural resources there should be a whole lot less of us on this planet. You see, they have no moral foundation, so these kind of thoughts enter their heads and stay there. Ann Coulter's book, "Demonic", nails it.

Actually, "Godless" is the book I was referring to. "Demonic" is her new one along the same line. I know, she is self promoting and a provocateur, but she is sharp as a whip and the best looking, sexiest conservative around! Of course, Michelle Malkin ain't bad, either!

[muggsy]

Rest easy.

http://www.usnews.com/news/washingto...control-treaty

[popgoestheweasel]

Actually, "Godless" is the book I was referring to. "Demonic" is her new one along the same line. I know, she is self promoting and a provocateur, but she is sharp as a whip and the best looking, sexiest conservative around! Of course, Michelle Malkin ain't bad, either!

to each their own BUT could someone, QUICK, pass me the extra heavy-duty beer goggles so i can try to see ms. godless as the "best looking, sexiest conservative around". heck, lush rimbaugh wouldn't make such a statement...even on an extra helping of oxy.

while clearly NOT sharp as whips, would sara palin and michelle whackman qualify for the contest? i'm thinkin i could cast a vote for either as long as it didn't put them closer to the white house.

[muggsy]

to each their own BUT could someone, QUICK, pass me the extra heavy-duty beer goggles so i can try to see ms. godless as the "best looking, sexiest conservative around". heck, lush rimbaugh wouldn't make such a statement...even on an extra helping of oxy.

while clearly NOT sharp as whips, would sara palin and michelle whackman qualify for the contest? i'm thinkin i could cast a vote for either as long as it didn't put them closer to the white house.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Have you ever taken a good hard look at Michel Obama, Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, Barbra Boxer, Whoopie Goldberg, Ellen Degenerate, etc. Nuff said.

[O'Dell]

In this case, I think Snopes explained the process pretty well. It ain't gonna happen, guys, at least not by some UN treaty.

[popgoestheweasel]

enough said would have been 'self promoting and provocative'.....and call it a wrap. as for those you've asked about, i'll go out on a limb and say none would win a 'beauty or sexy' contest.

[whitemule]

I do trust snopes for you average email rumor mill crap. It can be a handy dope slap for people that freak out over every HOLY CRAP!!! email that hits their inbox.

I have my suspicions about their "don't worry about it" attitude here, though. Let's see, they've already taken away full auto, short barreled shotguns, short barreled rifles, anybody remember the AWB? If we could rest easy with the second amendment, would we need the NRA and other 2A groups?

There's more truth in the worst SNOPES.COM article than a thousand by NRA, who are the biggest distortionists on the planet...IMHO!!

[1radman]

There's more truth in the worst SNOPES.COM article than a thousand by NRA, who are the biggest distortionists on the planet...IMHO!!

What parallel socialist utopian universe are you living in? Are you a gun owner?
Wake up and smell your shut down LGS!...IMHO!

[1radman]

#1. Michelle Malkin
#2. Michelle Backman
#3. Sarah Palin (but she talks real funny)
#4. Granny Clampet
#5. Ann Coulture

[1radman]

Hey muggsy and whitemule...
SNAP OUT OF IT! WE MAY NEED YOU BOTH IN THE FIGHT!
America's "death by 1000 cuts" has already begun. Each little win by the socialist (read Demoncrats) is another cut. The imperceptible creep of socialist policies must be stopped, before we all wake up one day and wonder WTF happened. Their agenda is disguised by their mild language..."reasonable" "fairness" "balanced approach" "compromise". With the help of complicit media like the lame stream networks, snopes, fact check, media matters etc, they will demonize any group that disagrees by calling them "extremist", "radical", "obstructionist". They have been fighting this battle since FDR and will patiently continue.
Don't mean to offend anyone who calls them self a democrat.
Classic Liberals and Democrats of decades past would not recognize today's Democrat party and would likely be conservatives.