NOT KIDDING, UN is coming!

[Chief Joseph]

NAGR Gun Rights Blog U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban

The hillary and the dems are backing us into a corner.

[Raoul]

International Gun Ban Treaty? | FactCheck.org

It's an international arms trade issue.

[ripley16]

I'm not sure we have anything to wory about as far as the U.N. is concerned. It is a totally inept organization with zero enforcement power. Haven't seen any blue helmets anywhere around here.

I worry more about Obama sucking more money out of my wallet and bankrupting the country. Carteresque inflation is looming ahead...that is a real threat.

[Raoul]

I'm not sure we have anything to wory about as far as the U.N. is concerned. It is a totally inept organization with zero enforcement power. Haven't seen any blue helmets anywhere around here.

I worry more about Obama sucking more money out of my wallet and bankrupting the country. Carteresque inflation is looming ahead...that is a real threat.

That and the Dem's continuation of GB's blatant moves to have federal control of all aspects of our lives.
Take a look at the "race to the top" education proposal. The main focus of that program is nothing more than a fedralization of local schools. The breakdown of the funding offered to states shows the bulk of the money going to standardization of test procedures and data gathering for the Dept. of Education. Couple this program with the joke that was NCLB and what you have is more invasive federal control and less local control of our children.

Sorry Chief, didn't mean to the thread.

[Chief Joseph]

International Gun Ban Treaty? | FactCheck.org

It's an international arms trade issue.

I'm sorry, factcheck isn't really a "factcheck" they have a left agenda themselves.

SayUncle » Fact Checking Fact Check

factcheck, like my daily oregonian newspaper, or dead fish wrapper as we call it, love to use the ploy of "checking the facts" when all they are doing is pushing their left and anti gun position. Usually very little facts get in the way of their position.

[Raoul]

I'm sorry, factcheck isn't really a "factcheck" they have a left agenda themselves.

SayUncle » Fact Checking Fact Check

factcheck, like my daily oregonian newspaper, or dead fish wrapper as we call it, love to use the ploy of "checking the facts" when all they are doing is pushing their left and anti gun position. Usually very little facts get in the way of their position.

And Bolton is of course totally unbiased?

[jeep45238]

I'm more worried about our current debt to GDP ratio of 86.62%.

Yesterday it was 86.60%.

Last week (Monday I think) it was 85.4%.

If that reaches 100%, we're literally in 3rd world country status.






And you will also never find anybody checking facts that is completely unbiased

[Chief Joseph]

And Bolton is of course totally unbiased?

At least with Bolton his bias is in favor of the 2nd Amendment and I actually liked Bolton, he was awesome and not a puppet of the un. Unlike hillary who received an F from the NRA. Don't forget, the Supreme Court overturning the DC gun ban was a 5-4 decision, with the liberal judges finding it ok to ban guns. Liberals, including supreme court justices do not adhere to the 2nd Amendment. If there is ever just one more liberal supreme court judge, we could quite easily find our gun rights GONE. And those appts are for LIFE. The dems have on many occasions talked of the "new world order", and that order is a world body government that supersedes our Constitution. Plus ruth bader ginsburg has admitted and argued for the use of FOREIGN law in our legal system. If we do not remain diligent, our gun rights will be gone.

[wyntrout]

And Bolton is of course totally unbiased?

I'll take bias like his any day. He's very skeptical of anything the corrupt and American hating UN membership wants to do... with mostly OUR money. He stood up to those #*$&@%* who ought to be kicked out of our country. He has a proper backbone and defends OUR country!
Wynn

[recoilguy]

That and the Dem's continuation of GB's blatant moves to have federal control of all aspects of our lives.
.

Oh man blaming the Dems move to total fedral control our lives on GB .....Please, Gb was a lot of things but control of all aspects.....nope thats the Dems 100%

RCG

[getsome]

Obama surrendering the internet to foreign powers....In an effort to show the world how inclusive, sharing, cooperative and international America can be, the Obama administration is planning to surrender control and key management of the internet by the U.S. Dept. of commerce and its agents... For years the international community has been pressuring the United States to surrender its management and control of the internet...They want an international body such as the United Nations to manage all aspects of the internet in behalf of all nations...This amounts to one small step for internationalism and one world order and one giant leap for surrendering America's control over an invention funded by tax payers that we have every right and responsibility to control and manage...What better country to protect the internet than the United States? We invented it, paid for the research and implementation that made it possible...We are the freest, most tolerant nation on earth, we believe in the fundamental right of free speach, and we practice a free market of commerce, trade and ideas...How on Gods earth did this man get elected to the most powerful position in the world? What will he do next??? I have often thought that the way to bring this country to its knees is to destroy the internet...I work for the largest telcom company in the world...starts with an A and ends with a T...we have become totally internet based with all our testing and circuit provisioning along with marketing...If something were to damage the internet backbone it would cause business as we know it to grind to a halt...Giving up control of the internet is an insane proposition....What if the U.N. in all its great wisdon decides that any web site dealing with guns or weapons is dangerous and must be banned????All I can think of to say is VOTE,VOTE, and VOTE some more and God help us make it to 2012 so we can get this buffoon out of office so he cant do any more damage!!!!!

[wyntrout]

What he said... Amen. It certainly won't be "free speech" anymore. The whole darn Internet can be snarled up by a committee-approach to running it. Just imagine all of the other countries who censor and limit the Internet access and content in their own countries now, having an input or veto on decisions!
It's like our being the only Superpower and protector of the "free world". Who would you rather be stronger and "leader and the Free world"? China would certainly like that role... And aspires to that militarily, as well as economically.
Wynn

[jeep45238]

86.65% Debt to GDP ratio....

[wyntrout]

86.65% Debt to GDP ratio....

Look up the "Cloward and Piven strategy". Obama is right on course with his "useful idiots" -- people who would give up OUR freedom for their temporary "security". It ain't about Democrats -- it's the "Progressives" who have hijacked the Democratic Party, but the rank and file Dems circle the wagons and protect anybody who says they are in the Democratic Party. Our "Dear Leader" doesn't even talk about the Democratic Party quite often... it's the Progressives against the pesky Wepublicans. I'll bet that you haven't noticed that. He spoke to and of the Progressives and the Republicans during his State of The Union address -- not much mention of Democrats.
Wynn

[jeep45238]

Don't lecture about parties to me, couldn't be further than the truth

"It serves to distract the Public Councils, and enfeeble the Public Administration....agitates the Community with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms; kindles the animosity of one....against another....it opens the door to foreign influence and corruption...thus the policy and the will of one country are subjected to the policy and will of another."

~George Washington
September 26, 1796