Gun owners not welcome.

[Chief Joseph]

Just watched this little jon stewart clip and the most noticeable part to me was their exclusion of "gun owners", not Conservative or Tea Party gun owners, but ALL gun owners. I think liberal gun owners should really consider if they want to support those who even hate them so much.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/even...****-and-evil/

replace the * with n-a-z-i-s, with out the - and it will work. Didn't know that was a banned word.

[PM9OWNER]

lol @ "tea-baggers"

I still usually vote for Dems. I doubt they will ever ban AR's but if they did I'd still have my beloved pistols and hunting rifles.
I think there are antis on both sides, but definitely more on the liberal side.

Thanks for sharing.

[les strat]

Wow. What a bunch of outstanding people. Winners for sure.

Guess since I am white, male, own a gun, southern ("redneck"), and Christian, I am not welcome. That's ok. I tend to hang with people who aren't haters like them.

Like I said in another thread, they thrive on dividing and isolating. As proven here, most of the flock doesn't have the brain capacity to think outside the liberal hand pamphlet (books are too long to read) or comprehend their own irony.

lol @ "tea-baggers"

I still usually vote for Dems. I doubt they will ever ban AR's but if they did I'd still have my beloved pistols and hunting rifles.
I think there are antis on both sides, but definitely more on the liberal side.

Thanks for sharing.

I'd be carefull about what you think you might still have if they ban AR's. Your SA pistols could be next. The hunting rifles, then.....

[PM9OWNER]

I'd be carefull about what you think you might still have if they ban AR's. Your SA pistols could be next. The hunting rifles, then.....

Whatever...

I agree that some of their personal views towards gun owners were unreasonable. But I also think you are unreasonable in thinking that liberals don't have the brain capacity to think outside some "liberal handbook". It seems you are a little closed minded yourself. But what do I know, I can't even comprehend my own Irony.

I can't change nearly all of my other political views just because some people think that a couple liberals can reverse the 2nd amendment..

[Bawanna]

[PM9OWNER]

Whoa, OK I'm done. No more political threads for me.

[les strat]

Whatever...

I agree that some of their personal views towards gun owners were unreasonable. But I also think you are unreasonable in thinking that liberals don't have the brain capacity to think outside some "liberal handbook". It seems you are a little closed minded yourself. But what do I know, I can't even comprehend my own Irony.

I can't change nearly all of my other political views just because some people think that a couple liberals can reverse the 2nd amendment..

I just go by what I hear come out of their own mouths. They make up my mind for me. I guess I am close minded as I stand firm own my own beliefs that are based on The Bible and our great Constitution, and in that order. I make no apologies for that.

As a fellow gun(s) owner to another, I was just trying to stress the importance of not taking any ban lightly. There is a huge push to not just ban ARs/AKs and other "scary" rifles, but also your right to carry or even own any gun that is semiautomatic or a magazine that hold more than 10 (we've already seen that law). We already have cities that do not allow you to own certain firearms, carry, or even defend yourself without prosecution. It's definitley more than just a couple gun grabbers wanting that right pulled.

I give you Europe as an example: first, gun registration and banning of carry and ownership of certain firearms. Laws passed where you absolutely cannot shoot someone in a home invasion. Then, hunters had to list what rifle they would be using at exactly what date and how many rounds they would have. If you had one more round than listed, felony, and your guns are history. Then, in some countries, laws where passed where you have to keep your guns elsewhere and check them out with lots of paperwork. It just grows, and grows.....

So yeah, I should have a fear of these types that want to ban any weapons whether I own them or not. You and everyone here should too. History often repeats itself.

"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." - Thomas Jefferson


Please read this when you have a chance. It's like looking in a mirror that's not too far down the road.

[Bawanna]

Whoa, OK I'm done. No more political threads for me.

It's all good, just a reminder that we're watching. I think I'll start using it more often. Hands are going to heck on me, might send a nice message without keyboarding. Hands are important ya know.

We each have our own personal pet peeves as it were and mine is getting personal over things we generally can't control. Not to be confused with disagreeing with another member but personal attacks (not saying you did but I think you were thinking of it) just wad my pantyhose up in knots.

[PM9OWNER]

Good points, and it is definitely a scary thought. I regret suggesting your closed mindedness. Sorry.

I found this interesting:
http://www.gunsandammo.com/2012/09/0...ting-shooters/

The article starts by explaining Romney's anti past. He has voted for a 5 day waiting period, and for the assault weapon ban as governor of Mass. in '04.

Has Romney really changed? Or does he just need votes..

[muggsy]

I can't say for sure if Mitt has changed, but I'd like to think that he's being honest. One damn thing for sure is that Obama hasn't changed. Obama has supported every gun control measure that his fellow democrats have proposed. I'm voting for change in this upcoming election.

[les strat]

Good points, and it is definitely a scary thought. I regret suggesting your closed mindedness. Sorry.

I found this interesting:
http://www.gunsandammo.com/2012/09/0...ting-shooters/

The article starts by explaining Romney's anti past. He has voted for a 5 day waiting period, and for the assault weapon ban as governor of Mass. in '04.

Has Romney really changed? Or does he just need votes..

No harm, no foul.

I do believe people's beliefs change and that sometimes people previously had certain mindsets that were wrong, but had good intentions. I am like muggsy in that I believe he is being honest, mainly by his choice in Paul Ryan.

[downtownv]

I always wondered how one can support the gun grabbing democrats AND be a gun owning enthusiast......
Kinda Like John Kerry a self made Nam vet hero that supports a party of the brady billers (Yes Brady was a republican) Bloomberg who wants more gun control yet his city is loaded with criminals that don't care what gun control he puts in place. It's oxymoronic.

[JFootin]

It's oxymoronic.

Moronic at any rate.

[DeaconKC]

Please realize that the President was part and parcel of the Chicago/Daley political machine before elected. This is the same group that has now banned shotguns holding more than 2 rounds, and semi automatic shotgun without allowing "grandfathering" . They just banned them in Chicago. Do you really think that they would stop at "assault rifles" given half a chance?

[PM9OWNER]

Well there are plenty more issues with which I am concerned, but I dare not voice them here. If it came down to just the issue of RKBA, sure I'd be right with ya.