Anti gun companies-stay away from them

[noslolo]

I knew that I loved Starbucks for good reason! Hate to hear about Levi's though. I will have to make the switch.

[O'Dell]

Looks like a role call of Democratic and liberal organizations and associations, and of course. the Hollywood left.

I recently received an E-Mail listing the Hollywood and TV women who were conservative. The list was longer than I suspected, and the subjects were a lot better looking than some of the leftist, like Rosie O'Donnell.

[Bawanna]

Looks like a role call of Democratic and liberal organizations and associations, and of course. the Hollywood left.

I recently received an E-Mail listing the Hollywood and TV women who were conservative. The list was longer than I suspected, and the subjects were a lot better looking than some of the leftist, like Rosie O'Donnell.

Bite your tongue O'Dell, we don't cotton to using that Rosie word round these parts, nor are we fond of that Oprah twin. Please work on your etiquette, it's terribly upsetting to the masses to see those words. Porn, foul language, this we can handle, just be careful of them witches.

[jlottmc]

Does R_RRR Rosie (there I got it, so hard to get that one off the fingers much less out of mouth) even qualify as human?

[Bawanna]

Does R_RRR Rosie (there I got it, so hard to get that one off the fingers much less out of mouth) even qualify as human?

Now your showing real signs of observation. The answer is negative good buddy, doesn't even have human genes, not even a micro cell of any part of the human food chain, nor does her running mate the yo yo skinny fat abomination of obama praising sub human lower than snakes geneology, that O thing. Now ya done it, ya got ole bawanna all lathered up. I gotta get back to therapy again and leave for awhile, I'm gaining on Wyn and getting to close. Got stay back in the drag and eat dust.

[jlottmc]

And why are the ones that are the most vocal in that arena also the dumbest? I mean Hitler Clinton, and Odumba et. al. Can they even hear themselves when they talk, or does it somehow make sense in their warped Weltschung?
Ok now I'm foaming at the mouth...gonna go fondle the iron, and shine the copper...

[joje]

hi all,

this might not be a good first post but the thread is missing {edit}the{/edit} company that gave us the clinton awb:

Sturm Ruger & Co
Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc.
200 Ruger Road
Prescott, AZ 86301-6150
(928) 778-6555

Sturm, Ruger - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[Bawanna]

hi all,

this might not be a good first post but the thread is missing {edit}the{/edit} company that gave us the clinton awb:

Sturm Ruger & Co
Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc.
200 Ruger Road
Prescott, AZ 86301-6150
(928) 778-6555

Sturm, Ruger - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ok, call me confused. Course some say that's fairly normal but I don't get what your trying to say. Apparently with the edit it's somehow lost it's meaning?

[jlottmc]

That's what I say. Bawanna.

[joje]

the edit was just fixing a typo, but perhaps my post wasn't very clear. that sometimes happens . i'll let wikipedia do the talking instead:


" In his letter to members of the House and Senate on 30 March 1989, Mr. Ruger stated (in what has come to be known as "The Ruger Letter"):
"The best way to address the firepower concern is therefore not to try to outlaw or license many millions of older and perfectly legitimate firearms (which would be a licensing effort of staggering proportions) but to prohibit the possession of high capacity magazines. By a simple, complete, and unequivocal ban on large capacity magazines, all the difficulty of defining "assault rifles" and "semi-automatic rifles" is eliminated. The large capacity magazine itself, separate or attached to the firearm, becomes the prohibited item. A single amendment to Federal firearms laws could prohibit their possession or sale and would effectively implement these objectives."[citation needed]
In addition to the furor from the National Rifle Association caused by "The Ruger Letter", Mr. Ruger made additional comments during an interview with NBC network's Tom Brokaw that angered the NRA further, saying: "no honest man needs more than 10 rounds in any gun…" and "I never meant for simple civilians to have my 20 and 30 round magazines…". It has long been Ruger's policy to limit sales of those items to Law Enforcement or Military purchasers.[citation needed]
This position, coming from an important firearms manufacturer such as Mr. Ruger, caused outrage in some segments of the the shooting sports community and led some to boycott Ruger's products.
"The Ruger Letter" is widely believed to be the genesis for those parts of legislation that were drafted 5 years later in the now defunct Assault Weapons Ban which prohibited the manufacture of any magazines holding over 10 rounds of ammunition for civilian sale, except to the motion-picture industry, which Ruger continued to pursue"

[jlottmc]

Hmmm, that could have been construed as Ruger's attempt to deflect and appease the coming storm that did come and has since past, but seems to be brewing again. I happen to have four Ruger's, and I gotta say that I love them dearly. The other side of that equation is that with the SR9(c) and the new additions to the CCW market, and with the SR556, Ruger's board has finally seen the light. This requires more study I think. Bill Ruger has been a person of high regard in my opinions.

[Bawanna]

the edit was just fixing a typo, but perhaps my post wasn't very clear. that sometimes happens . i'll let wikipedia do the talking instead:


" In his letter to members of the House and Senate on 30 March 1989, Mr. Ruger stated (in what has come to be known as "The Ruger Letter"):
"The best way to address the firepower concern is therefore not to try to outlaw or license many millions of older and perfectly legitimate firearms (which would be a licensing effort of staggering proportions) but to prohibit the possession of high capacity magazines. By a simple, complete, and unequivocal ban on large capacity magazines, all the difficulty of defining "assault rifles" and "semi-automatic rifles" is eliminated. The large capacity magazine itself, separate or attached to the firearm, becomes the prohibited item. A single amendment to Federal firearms laws could prohibit their possession or sale and would effectively implement these objectives."[citation needed]
In addition to the furor from the National Rifle Association caused by "The Ruger Letter", Mr. Ruger made additional comments during an interview with NBC network's Tom Brokaw that angered the NRA further, saying: "no honest man needs more than 10 rounds in any gun…" and "I never meant for simple civilians to have my 20 and 30 round magazines…". It has long been Ruger's policy to limit sales of those items to Law Enforcement or Military purchasers.[citation needed]
This position, coming from an important firearms manufacturer such as Mr. Ruger, caused outrage in some segments of the the shooting sports community and led some to boycott Ruger's products.
"The Ruger Letter" is widely believed to be the genesis for those parts of legislation that were drafted 5 years later in the now defunct Assault Weapons Ban which prohibited the manufacture of any magazines holding over 10 rounds of ammunition for civilian sale, except to the motion-picture industry, which Ruger continued to pursue"

Thanks for the clarification joje. I didn't make the connection to the wikopedia and was taken aback by all the Ruger stuff. I thought you were a representative of Ruger. If in fact the "letter" is true and I don't doubt that it is I would say it was a slight boo boo in a lifetime of wonderful achievements in Bill Rugers. Many years ago I had a telephone conversation with the man himself and it will always be noted as a highlight in my life. He was a truely down to earth honest guy. I suspect as often happens he spoke without looking at the big overall picture. Much as S&W did much more recently. I'm happy to say that as traumatic as that event was they seemed to have recovered under new management and are thriving and doing very well. I only hope for some miracle to get Colt back into the civilian market on a scale much closer to the old days. I guess I just long for the old days in general.

[jlottmc]

I think we all miss the old days Bawanna.

[joje]

heh, no, definitely not representing ruger. i have avoided their products ever since the clinton days, although i have to admit im getting ready to break down and get the blackhawk i always wanted. getting too old not to have a cowboy piece in the collection

but anyway, before then im looking to get a pm9 or possibly cw9 for ccw, which is why i joined this board. i like to read up on my future guns before actually buying them

[Bawanna]

heh, no, definitely not representing ruger. i have avoided their products ever since the clinton days, although i have to admit im getting ready to break down and get the blackhawk i always wanted. getting too old not to have a cowboy piece in the collection

but anyway, before then im looking to get a pm9 or possibly cw9 for ccw, which is why i joined this board. i like to read up on my future guns before actually buying them

I'd have no hesitation getting the Blackhawk you won't be dissappointed. I currently have 4 and they are hands down the most trouble free guns I've ever owned. If you've avoided them since the Clin crap I can't even type that word you've only cheated and abused yourself. Like those that boycotted S&W, perhaps they messed up but they still had a great product. They deserved the boycott but that was yesterday, it's a new ball game, bury your hatchet.
The PM9 is very very popular here too and you won't be dissapointed with it either.