Is a grain like 135 or 165 better than like 185 for home defense so it doesn't penetrate through walls and stuff?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Whats better for home defense?
Collapse
X
-
No, they will go through the wall, but they won't go through an intruder with a center mass hit. Some FMJ may pass through the intruder, but a center hit with a hollow point should stay within the body cavity. In the home I feel that you are much better off using a shotgun with bird shot. If you have kids train them to hit the floor behind their beds if things get loud at night.Never trust anyone who doesn't trust you to own a gun.
Life Member - NRA
Colt Gold Cup 70 series
Colt Woodsman
Ruger Mark III .22-45
Kahr CM9
Kahr P380
Comment
-
sorry, I may have misunderstood the question. if you are talking about AFTER you've hit your target, then all other things being equal (manufacturer, load, bullet design, etc), then yes, I suppose you are correct. the lighter bullet is going to stop first typically. but as muggsy said, if you hit your target, and you are using a JHP defense type round, it's gonna stop in the intruder. there are exceptions to every scenario though.
that being said, there are plenty of non-equal comparisons where this would not apply. for example, I just asked some questions about the 9mm 135gr Critical Duty (not Critical Defense) in another thread and I've been looking at the various test of that round, and I'd say that it penetrates and stops in _about_ the same depths and situations as the Winchester PDX1 147gr 9mm...give or take.
Probably best to look at some real tests of the rounds you are considering and make your best educated guess. Anything other than the el-cheapo JHP rounds you get at Walmart (like WWB, etc) are going to perform relatively well and as many will say, shot placement and being well practiced with your sidearm is far and away a better method for preventing over-penetration (or missing your target all-together).
Comment
-
if you hit the intruder your going to have to repaint the walls anyways, so as long as you stop the intruder even if you miss with a shot it would be worth fixing the wall.
if you use a shot gun with bird shot like most of us do, your gaurenteed to get good at repairing the holes in the wall.BOB
Comment
-
Originally posted by ESAFO View Postif you hit the intruder your going to have to repaint the walls anyways, so as long as you stop the intruder even if you miss with a shot it would be worth fixing the wall.
if you use a shot gun with bird shot like most of us do, your gaurenteed to get good at repairing the holes in the wall.
Handguns are for carrying. Shotguns and rifles are for fighting.
Comment
-
Originally posted by chrish View PostThe hole in the wall is the least of my concerns. A missed shot with a handgun round, any handgun round other than frangible, could leave your house and enter your neighbors house where another human being is sleeping. That's the over-penetration concern and the reason to be considering a shotgun or even an AR for home defense over a handgun.
Handguns are for carrying. Shotguns and rifles are for fighting.BOB
Comment
-
Originally posted by ESAFO View Postyour more worried about a hand gun penetrating your neighbors house than a AR
My point is that it doesn't much matter. The best choices to stop an attack are also going to have over-penetration issues with things like drywall, siding, etc...yes, including an AR, just not as much as a pistol round.
Comment
-
Originally posted by chrish View PostActually yes, handgun rounds don't tumble. .223/5.56 will tumble. If you look at tests, AR round will not penetrate stuff like drywall layers as much as a handgun round. Neither are good, I'll grant you that. But even a shotgun if you are using a defensive round like a slug, or one of the .38/9mm 3-ball deals w/ a slug behind it are gonna penetrate too. Only thing that won't punch thru layers of drywall are things that I don't trust to stop an attack.
My point is that it doesn't much matter. The best choices to stop an attack are also going to have over-penetration issues with things like drywall, siding, etc...yes, including an AR, just not as much as a pistol round.Never trust anyone who doesn't trust you to own a gun.
Life Member - NRA
Colt Gold Cup 70 series
Colt Woodsman
Ruger Mark III .22-45
Kahr CM9
Kahr P380
Comment
-
Originally posted by chrish View PostHandguns are for carrying. Shotguns and rifles are for fighting.Wake Up...Grow Up...Show Up...Sit Up...Shut Up...Listen Up
Comment
-
The only thing I can think of when a shotgun would be the wrong choice is in a hostage-type situation. Otherwise, I am all about the shotgun over a pistol.
Have both at the ready if you can.“I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials.”
“To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.”
--George Mason
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Got that DC?
Comment
-
Originally posted by muggsy View PostI've seen AR rounds completely destroy concrete cinder blocks. You might want to rethink that statement. All projectiles will tumble and yaw to some extent as the lose velocity.
And maybe 'tumble' is a bad choice of words here, let's call it less stable once it hits that first barrier.
Empirical evidence from one guy to the next will always make this debatable I suppose.
Just sayin'...
Comment
Comment