I don't know enough to dispute any of this, that's why I asked the original question. I do remember the thing about the common statements about Newton and his opposite and equal reaction. Was he talking about momentum or energy? According to CJB who I suspect knows a bit more than I, it must be momentum.
I never "got" this stuff in school so though I understand what is said, I often don't understand the reasoning. If I lift a 100lb barbell (not lately!) from a bench I can say I exerted 100lbs of force on it and therefore 100lbs on me. That I get just by having doe it. The weight went up and my shoulders were pressed down. If I push 100lbs against a large boulder the energy may be applied even though it doesn't move but my shoulders still get the 100lbs against them. The mass is large, the velocity is zero but energy applied. I'm getting a headache.
I never "got" this stuff in school so though I understand what is said, I often don't understand the reasoning. If I lift a 100lb barbell (not lately!) from a bench I can say I exerted 100lbs of force on it and therefore 100lbs on me. That I get just by having doe it. The weight went up and my shoulders were pressed down. If I push 100lbs against a large boulder the energy may be applied even though it doesn't move but my shoulders still get the 100lbs against them. The mass is large, the velocity is zero but energy applied. I'm getting a headache.
Comment