y'all been too quiet here lately and I need to read more reloading chatter. Having devoted my first year primarily to loading nothing but .357 mag, I'm ready to buy another set of dies. Even though my (social) carry guns are now the CW9 and CM9, I just don't see any real cost saving advantage to load 9mm. That's the reason I've loaded near 1000 rounds of .357 mag in the last year .... component prices averaging about $8 per 50 rounds (depending mainly on bullet variety) vs $22-30 for factory "range ammo". The next most expensive ammo I use (or would if it were "affordable") is .45 acp. In rifles, I do love my 30-30 and .243, but the old 30-30 just begs to be shot - alot. So, the dilemma is which set of dies and components to concentrate on next. I don't really "need" to shoot either the Kimber or the old Marlin, as I don't carry the Kimber much, if any, and now very rarely have a chance to hunt. The reasoning for loading the .45 next is the simplicity of the straight walled case, simple loads and multitudes of bullet styles. Then the thought of the next progression should be a simple rifle round, although the 30-30 has a lot less in projectile availability. Either would require stocking different primers than what I keep now as well as powders (although I can use Unique in the .45, and possibly in some loads for the 30-30). Brass for either one is really not an issue, at least in the quantities I would be loading. And both would be in the same range of cost savings as the .357 mag.... around 50-65% (or more).
One possible tie breaker is that a buddy offered to loan me his 30-30 dies to try out. If I can work the brass without crushing it, the 30-30 may just have to be next.
MORE RELOAD TALK NEEDED
surv
One possible tie breaker is that a buddy offered to loan me his 30-30 dies to try out. If I can work the brass without crushing it, the 30-30 may just have to be next.
MORE RELOAD TALK NEEDED
surv


Comment