Yes, I'm talking P & CW vs PM & CM vs T. I have a friend who pocket carries a CM9 almost everyday. He loaned that CW to me with its pocket holster for several days since I wanted one to pocked carry. I'm sorry but I never made it over a few steps from the car with that thing except I took it on my morning mile walk once. Some can pocket carry the M's but I'm not comfortable doing it, however, I do have a Kel-Tec P3AT that I feel OK carrying in a pocket. We all like to have the smallest piece we can have but as long as it has to be belt carried I find the CW and P conceal just as good as the m on a belt. However, with pocket carry, I would, if I could, but I can't.
I started with KAHR over 10 years ago because of the size and how the K40 felt and shot. However, reliability issues caused us to part company. When the P9 first came out I had to try it. It had some issues also but I worked them out by relieving some of the close tolorances around the chamber block. This P9 and I have been putting up with each other for over 10 years now. Pocket carry will have to go with the Kel-Tec and as far as the T's go my Glock 22 will cover that ground.
I quess the point I'm trying to make is; that if it has to be belt carried I still prefer my P9 (CW9 is same size). I like the feel of my pinky on the gun, the extra stability, the extra round, the extra sight radius and the extra velocity the 3.5" barrel gives me over the 3". I tried real hard to like the M's and some can pocket carry it but I can't.
I started with KAHR over 10 years ago because of the size and how the K40 felt and shot. However, reliability issues caused us to part company. When the P9 first came out I had to try it. It had some issues also but I worked them out by relieving some of the close tolorances around the chamber block. This P9 and I have been putting up with each other for over 10 years now. Pocket carry will have to go with the Kel-Tec and as far as the T's go my Glock 22 will cover that ground.
I quess the point I'm trying to make is; that if it has to be belt carried I still prefer my P9 (CW9 is same size). I like the feel of my pinky on the gun, the extra stability, the extra round, the extra sight radius and the extra velocity the 3.5" barrel gives me over the 3". I tried real hard to like the M's and some can pocket carry it but I can't.


. The CW9 has quickly turned out to be my favorite IWB gun. But...after pocket carrying a PF9 for 6 years, I started thinking about a CM9 for the same reasons above. Got one at a good price and I can't really tell any difference in pocket carrying it vs the PF9....and it shoots DPX real well. Pocket carrying a PF9 for so long vs something the size of a P3AT probably made for an easier transition for me?

Comment