25th Anniversary K9
25th Anniversary K9

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

+p Necessary?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by berettabone View Post
    I currently use HST's 147 gr. in my MK9, and use the 230 gr. HST's in my .45. I don't think you have to worry too much about all the penetration, expansion hooha.........a .45 makes a BIG hole, no matter what your using.
    My favorite gun quote: "A 9mm may not expand, but a 45 will never shrink."

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by O'Dell View Post
      My favorite gun quote: "A 9mm may not expand, but a 45 will never shrink."
      We're going to have to call that "O'dells wise quite of the day"
      The only thing better than having all the guns and ammo you'd ever need would be being able to shoot it all off the back porch.

      Want to see what will be the end of our country as we know it???
      Visit here:
      http://www.usdebtclock.org/

      Comment


      • #18
        Done my own testing with my Chrony Beta Chronograph. Bottom line:

        Compared to regular ammo,
        +P goes faster out of a short or a long barrel pistol = more energy

        There is not much more to say. Is it necessary? I suppose if you want a
        round that potentially can penetrate more. Also +P are almost always
        associated with better quality bullets made to expand and not designate.

        I recommend +P CCI Speer Gold Dot (very hot fast rounds), second +P
        Federal HST (nice rounds used by Law Enforcement), both in 124 Grain.
        The third is Hornaday +P Critical Duty 135Grain. Little disappointed the
        Hornaday was a little under speed, than advertised, but then I was
        shooting out of Glock 26. However the others were out of the same
        Glock 26. Critical Duty is a bigger 135Gr bullet however. I am sure it will
        do the job, but Gold Dot and HST are my preferences; all are rated for
        penetration.

        Self Defense Rounds
        cost a lot more, with the nickel plate case, no flash
        powder and other features, I gather they're slightly higher quality control,
        thus slightly higher reliability and ballistic performance. However I have
        had 100% reliability with my Kahr CM9 and Glock 26 using +P self
        defense rounds with regular old target grade RN 9mm ammo, commercial
        reloads and my own personal reloads. I would not feed any pistol a steady
        diet of +P for target shooting for cost and wear and tear on the weapon.
        Some 9mm pistols like the Dimondback DB9 are not +P rated. That
        is why I passed on that make and model. With that said a non +P
        version of the Speer Gold Dot or other self defense round would do
        the job in the DB9 or CM9/PM9. In general round nose (RN) is not
        a good self defense round, +P or not.

        Comment


        • #19
          I used standard velocity 230gr Hydra Shoks in my CW45. They are said to expand at a lower velocity than many other HP bullets. I never did any testing to find out, for sure. I also heard from the gunsmith at the indoor range I go too, that using the 185gr loads with the shorter barrel .45 pistols are more effective than the 230gr, less mass to get moving to a faster velocity out of the shorter barrel. Again I didn't do any testing. Just took his word on it. That is all just hearsay, so I wouldn't take it as gospel.
          Tom
          Live today, tomorrow may not come!
          Boberg XR9S
          Kahr CW40
          Springfield Armory 1911
          Dan Wesson Revolver

          HY*NDAI is to cars, what Caracal, Hi-Point, and Jennings is to handguns. The cars may or may not run ok, but the corporation SUCKS.

          Comment


          • #20
            so true

            [QUOTE=O'Dell;289544]My favorite gun quote: "A 9mm may not expand, but a 45 will never shrink."[/QUOTE

            ol Jocko's favorite quote: U just gotta pray the round gets there though
            . My PM9 has over 34,000+ rounds through it, and runs much better than an illegal trying to get across our border


            NRA BENEFACTOR MEMBER


            MAY GOD BLESS MUGGSY

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Longitude Zero View Post
              Post mortem bullet examination is like muggsy posted the definitive result.
              I disagree….not about Muggsy but "post mortem being definitive result." That is like showing the winning game films of a 4-12 football team and saying they are a great team. What about the losses? What about the bullets that did not cause a death? How did they fair? All bullets from the same manufacture, the same caliber, the same box don't always yield the same result. Most shootings do not result in a death. So post mortem examination is a very very small percentage of bullets fired. Now if you mix in other bullets that were taken from a body that did not cause a death you get a better idea how good a bullet is but then there is the question what distance was the round shot at? What length of barrel? And so on. All makes a difference. Post mortem has it's place but I highly question if it is definitive. I think the FIRST video of Dave posted was the most informative. He tells shooters the best thing to do is find a caliber you can shoot well and keep on target then practice practice practice. Shot placement is king…..just saying.

              Comment


              • #22
                Here is a graph that tells the difference:
                The take always:
                Longer barrel more energy
                +P is more energy (faster velocities)
                +P helps short barrels as much or more than longer ones
                Heavier bullet doesn't always mean more energy, mass x velocity squared.




                Comment

                Working...
                X