CM9 or CM40??

[njsportsman]

Well first let me start by saying I am fairly new to this forum. About a year ago I was contemplating buying a PM9 or PM40 but just was out of my price range so, I opted to buy the Kel Tec PF9 and although I have had no problems I have been seeing a lot of negative reviews. I only have maybe a 150 rounds through it. Since then the CM series has come out and at a more reasonable price I am thinking about trading in my PF9 for one of the CM’s preferably the CM40. I just have never seen the negative bashing like the PF9’s are taking. So now to my question can someone tell me the differences between the PM and CM series and is the CM series reliable? Sometimes my PF9 is my only line of defense because of carry conditions clothing etc. So let’s hear all the good and bad about the CM series. Thanks

[CrabbyAzz]

Love my CM9. I can spend a whole afternoon at the range with it and never get tired of shooting it.

[Harleyrider]

Love my CM9. I can spend a whole afternoon at the range with it and never get tired of shooting it.

I really like mine, too. Regarding 9 v. .40, there is a noticeable difference in felt recoil, especially in light, compact guns like the CM and PM series. It is enough of a difference that I carry my CM9 and like shooting it, while my buddy, an ex-LEO, gave his PM40 to his son 'cause he hated shooting it.

Regarding PM v. CM, others probably have more detailed info, but my impression is that the main differences are (1) polyganol v. standard rifling (which doesn't matter if you aren't using it as primarily a range or competition gun), (2) the slide finish, and (3) 1 magazine v. 2 magazines. To me, these aren't worth much, let alone the price difference.

Let's go back to the threshold issue, though. If you are happy with your PF-9, why sell it? You will find internet posts bashing every firearm ever made, including Kahrs. In fact, the PF-9 is an excellent gun for its type and price. Like all Kel-Tecs (and I carry a P3AT when I am not carrying my CM9), its fit and finish leave a lot to be desired. But KT makes good guns. If you have one that works well, don't second guess it. Just carry it with pride. Yes, the CM9 is a lot prettier, but it's also more expensive and heavier.

Check out the Kel-Tec Owners Group at http://thektog.org/ and see what the owners of PF-9's think of their guns.

[skiflydive]

I like my CM9 a lot. It's essentially a PM9 with a few less features I don't need (Polygonal rifling for example) and an extra magazine. I got my CM9 with an extra mag for $430 ay my LGS which is a good $200 saving I think.

The CM9 shoots well, has very low recoil for it's size and weight, and has everything I was looking for in a CC pistol. I have NO regrets about buying it.

When you get it, make sure you go to the tech section of this site and look at the stickies at the top of the page about proper lube and prep.

Enjoy your new CM9 and welcome to the group.

[RxDoc]

CM9 hands down. Can't ask for anything better. Lightweight, concealable, powerful (CorBon DPX 9mm+P has high "one shot stop" rating with M.Ayoob, et al), easy breakdown, Kahr construction, reliable (recommends 200rd. "break in", would do it anyway before carrying!), accurate even at distances, and reasonably priced. More cost effective than .40cal. Differences from P and C series explained above, essentially a PM9 with a different barrel, and one less mag. Really love mine, shares SD carry with Ruger LCR .357mag, trust both with my life.

[jocko]

u will certainly enjoy shooting a cm9 over a cm40 most any day of the week..

[TheTman]

I like the .40, but would probably go with the CM9 with it's small grip for controlability. I'm waiting to see if the CM45 comes out, I think it would be more controllable than the CM40. If I did get a CM40, I think that is one weapon I'd want magna-ported for sure.

[jocko]

probably right but I have read where some port their polymer 40's and express still alot of recoil. Kinda hard to tame down a tiger with two slots i the barrel. Just sayin. compared to a 9mm which is semi tame to start wth and then ported just makes it so so much more enjoyable to shoot. To me that is what it has alwyas been about. I wantto shoot alot of what I carry andI don'tmean 9mm caliber but the total gun package. I can't picutre my signature line saying 32k ROUNDS out of my PM40 and it runds like an illegal alien crossing the border. Not sure my wallet could handle it well either. After watching that viedo some one posted on here it is kinda hard ti dispute the 40 cal as a totally pleasant gun to shoot...Just sayin.

[yqtszhj]

Cm9

[olympicmotorcars]

Sorry everybody, I have to vote 40 all the way.

[Infidel proud]

CM9 all the way, have almost 1000 rounds through mine without a single problem, easy shootin easy packin...

[jokester]

Iam looking to get the cm40 to keep my cm9 company.!!!Cant find one local but i will keep looking.Dont really want to buy one on line but thats just me.

[Joe L]

I carry a CM9 when I'm in a good mood, a PM40 when I'm in a bad mood.

[jocko]

I would think the BG wouldhope ur in a good mood. Just sayin

[jeepster09]

I vote for the 40. I also think the Kel Tec 9 is a good inexpensive gun that works well. For those wuss's that don't like shooting the 40......GET IT MAGNAPORTED!