Originally posted by ltxi
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
.40 S&W dead - yes or no
Collapse
X
-
If you run short on shorts, let me know, I got's some around here. Use em for vermin and such, two legged and 4 legged.Originally posted by ltxi View PostIt don't appear to be available in .22 short.
http://bawanna45.wix.com/bawannas-grip-emporium#!
In Memory of Paul "Dietrich" Stines.
Dad: Say something nice to your cousin Shirley
Dietrich: For a fat girl you sure don't sweat much.
Cue sound of Head slap.
RIP Muggsy & TMan
Comment
-
I hate to stimulate the crazy part of your brain (and mine), but ammo for the Five Seven doesn't appear to be as expensive as it used to be, and is plentiful. In fact, it looks like it's generally much less than good .380 ammo:Originally posted by boscobarbell View PostThe sane part of my brain is making the same argument.
With the hardware I have now, I'm already well-equipped for the zombie apocalypse anyway. And I've got just about every carry condition covered, too. Which really just leaves collecting and shooting...and if that ammo is expensive, the latter probably isn't an option anyway.
The crazy gun zealot part of my brain keeps telling me how much fun it would be to own that toy!
https://ammoseek.com/ammo/5.7x28mmLast edited by gale155; 08-13-2018, 03:05 PM.
Comment
-
Well Bosco, I'm going to do us both a big favor here. For all of these years I've been lusting for a Five Seven, I really haven't done a great deal of research on them. Lately, I have done quite a bit of research, and guess what? The Five Seven is a SAO hammer fired pistol. The hammer is fully enclosed under the slide, and I guess that's why I assumed it was striker fired. So, it's essentially a 1911 on which you can't see or manually manipulate the hammer. With such a light trigger pull, I think one would be crazy to use this thing for carry or home defense without the unconventionally-located safety being engaged. Therefore, it's been scratched off of my lust list...and I assume yours. You can thank me later.Originally posted by gale155 View PostI hate to stimulate the crazy part of your brain (and mine), but ammo for the Five Seven doesn't appear to be as expensive as it used to be, and is plentiful. In fact, it looks like it's generally much less than good .380 ammo:
https://ammoseek.com/ammo/5.7x28mm
Comment
-
Another thing you might want to research about the FN FiveSeven is the chamber exploding once in a while. Not often, mind you. I had it on my list about 10 years ago or so until I read about this.
I would imagine that FN has addressed this over the years but I haven't followed this issue since I lost interest.
Comment
-
Well, you did fix me up good during my .22 CB crisis a couple/few years back, fer which I still thank you. But I at the moment have plenty of shorts. Std copper washed RN works best in the Minx. And I prefer them anyway. At least for offensive use. Best for just rattling around without exiting the brain pan.Originally posted by Bawanna View PostIf you run short on shorts, let me know, I got's some around here. Use em for vermin and such, two legged and 4 legged.
And speaking of shorts....I haven't worn a pair of long pants for a year and a half now. Not since just after beginning chemo treatment. A "because I can" statement, it's been.
And, now back to the .40 sucks/don't suck original topic...
NRA Benefactor
Comment
-
Thanks...wasn't aware of that, but I've scratched the Five Seven off my wish list. I know it's perhaps illogical, but I've always had an aversion to 1911 style, SAO pistols. I've never owned one, and have never even fired one. I think it's true that you can't teach an old dog new tricks.Originally posted by AJBert View PostAnother thing you might want to research about the FN FiveSeven is the chamber exploding once in a while. Not often, mind you. I had it on my list about 10 years ago or so until I read about this.
I would imagine that FN has addressed this over the years but I haven't followed this issue since I lost interest.
Comment
-
I think the .40 is best suited to the "compact" or duty-sized pistol. A Glock 23 holds 13+1 of .40, which is a susbstantial capacity of a capable round. A Glock 22 is 15+1 in a G17 sized platform. Substantial and close enough to 9mm capacity in the same platform as to be a good choice. .40 recoil is manageable in G19 or larger pistols. My only .40 is an HK USP Compact, and firing hot factory ammo isn't unpleasant.
However, I've also fired .40 out of a Shield. It was not pleasant. Not .357 Magnum J-frame unpleasant, but it still was not fun. .40 is such a powerful round that it's pretty snappy in a small pistol. The capacity of a CM40 is 5+1. 6 rounds of .40 vs 7 rounds of 9mm in a carry gun is a big difference, IMO. I want as much capacity in as small a platform as possible. To my mind, I'd rather have seven rounds on board than six in the same size platform.
But if I was in the market for my first pistol, I'd be all over a police trade in G22 or SIG P229. Heck, even new pistols seem to be cheaper in .40 than 9mm. But $400 or so for a P229 with 3 magazines in .40 is a screaming deal.
Comment
-
I shoot .40 cal. out of an M&P .40 compact and an HK P2SK, neither is unpleasant to shoot, the HK being a bit smoother and my favorite carry piece. I shoot at least 200 rds. when practicing without any difficulties. I wouldn't want my MK to be in .40, a bit small in stature. Anything larger is a breeze...………………………….
Comment
-
True Old Dogs grew up on them 1911's, and DA revolvers. Methinks you must be a Middle Aged Dog.Originally posted by gale155 View PostThanks...wasn't aware of that, but I've scratched the Five Seven off my wish list. I know it's perhaps illogical, but I've always had an aversion to 1911 style, SAO pistols. I've never owned one, and have never even fired one. I think it's true that you can't teach an old dog new tricks.
NRA Benefactor
Comment
-
Air Force Law Enforcement Specialist for 3 years and 7 months, civilian cop for a total of 28 years, and armed data center security for 10 years. I'm 66 years old, and have never owned, fired or even held a 1911. Strange I'll admit, but it's the truth.Originally posted by ltxi View PostTrue Old Dogs grew up on them 1911's, and DA revolvers. Methinks you must be a Middle Aged Dog.
Comment
-
Nice to hear from another P2SK fan. I, too, have one in .40, and also have a a bunch of H&K USP Compact magazines with the X-grip attachment to make range days more enjoyable (and usually carry one as a spare). Amazing quality, and an amazing shooter for its size. I can shoot it all day without issue.Originally posted by berettabone View PostI shoot .40 cal. out of an M&P .40 compact and an HK P2SK, neither is unpleasant to shoot, the HK being a bit smoother and my favorite carry piece. I shoot at least 200 rds. when practicing without any difficulties. I wouldn't want my MK to be in .40, a bit small in stature. Anything larger is a breeze...………………………….
It's a chunky little guy, but in my Black Arch IWB hybrid holster it just disappears.Last edited by boscobarbell; 08-15-2018, 08:01 AM.
Comment
-
Our experiences are not dissimilar, and I've never carried a 1911, nor cared to. I'm a big fan of gross motor skills in times of stress, and that safety release is just one step too many in my opinion. (I'm not arguing universally...I just know my own personal limitations). I don't even use slide releases...always sling-shot for me.Originally posted by gale155 View PostAir Force Law Enforcement Specialist for 3 years and 7 months, civilian cop for a total of 28 years, and armed data center security for 10 years. I'm 66 years old, and have never owned, fired or even held a 1911. Strange I'll admit, but it's the truth.
I've shot 1911s at the range, and found them quite enjoyable. But not enough to ever try to rewire my shooter's brain to learn the system.
But I have hedged my bet a little bit with the Sig Legion: big caliber, big frame, big beavertail, and a great SA pull (after the DA first trigger pull). Close enough.....
Comment
-
Well said, and those are my thoughts on the 1911 design. I'm not a collector, and all of my guns (with the exception of a couple of .22's) serve as home defense and/or carry. If I were a collector, I'd undoubtedly have a few 1911 pistols in my inventory. It would be absurd and silly to be critical of the design, but like you I simply know my limitations.Originally posted by boscobarbell View PostOur experiences are not dissimilar, and I've never carried a 1911, nor cared to. I'm a big fan of gross motor skills in times of stress, and that safety release is just one step too many in my opinion. (I'm not arguing universally...I just know my own personal limitations). I don't even use slide releases...always sling-shot for me.
I've shot 1911s at the range, and found them quite enjoyable. But not enough to ever try to rewire my shooter's brain to learn the system.
But I have hedged my bet a little bit with the Sig Legion: big caliber, big frame, big beavertail, and a great SA pull (after the DA first trigger pull). Close enough.....
Comment

Comment