We agree about false division, but I couldn't disagree more about (a system of) government being THE scam. Without a system of government, you have no common services, no protection from common threats, no common system of law, no national currency and no property rights other than what you and your clan can muster to take and hold. You may not have meant this, but think through that statement to its logical extension... Saying government IS the scam is tantamount to advocating anarchy.
Global history is rife with THAT configuration. Heck, in America we had more than a century of industrial-era rubber-stamps for corporations (defined as a body of interests with their own governing rules) that prevailed over disorganized used-and-abused immigrant populations. That is, until they unionized. Wanna go back to that and really get our Ayn Rand on? Or maybe go further with pre-colonial, pre-constitutional frontier life where life expectancy was in its 30s because there was not yet a foundation of law, currency, infrastructure, and regulation that commerce could rely upon. No thanks.
I assert this point because frankly is so easy to call out every government failure and call for its evisceration, and to suspect bogey men behind every corner as justification for just saying F it. It takes real skill, guts and stamina to stand up for, and contribute to a robust and open government that's inclusive and more than just a constitutional template. Our founding fathers knew this, and you can see it in their lives well after ratification.
Government is US. When WE disconnect and alienate ourselves from the grand parade, we make a conscious decision to let others control it on our behalf. Governance is supposed to be hard, and messy, because people are complicated. But without it and our participation in it, we're on our own, weaker than operating as a group, just as those industrial era immigrants did.
Global history is rife with THAT configuration. Heck, in America we had more than a century of industrial-era rubber-stamps for corporations (defined as a body of interests with their own governing rules) that prevailed over disorganized used-and-abused immigrant populations. That is, until they unionized. Wanna go back to that and really get our Ayn Rand on? Or maybe go further with pre-colonial, pre-constitutional frontier life where life expectancy was in its 30s because there was not yet a foundation of law, currency, infrastructure, and regulation that commerce could rely upon. No thanks.
I assert this point because frankly is so easy to call out every government failure and call for its evisceration, and to suspect bogey men behind every corner as justification for just saying F it. It takes real skill, guts and stamina to stand up for, and contribute to a robust and open government that's inclusive and more than just a constitutional template. Our founding fathers knew this, and you can see it in their lives well after ratification.
Government is US. When WE disconnect and alienate ourselves from the grand parade, we make a conscious decision to let others control it on our behalf. Governance is supposed to be hard, and messy, because people are complicated. But without it and our participation in it, we're on our own, weaker than operating as a group, just as those industrial era immigrants did.


Comment