agree
one is just asking for issues doing that. I just seen a clip on TV last week and then an article in the Wall Street Journal of people pushing the envelope at Starbucks which has non restrictions on OC. It showed people in mass at this one starbucks with OC.
Now It is putting starbucks on the spot to, for they want to abide by state laws but they are also business people and if we flaunt that OC stuff in people faces that don't understand it, then you can bet you will see a policy change at Starbucks. It is called survival.
Just makes no damn sense to OC, whether it is lawful or not. A business also has a write to disallow OC, and then we get all pissed over it and come to find out that normally it is the gun owners themselves who have pressed the issued, ...
Originally posted by Raoul
View Post
Now It is putting starbucks on the spot to, for they want to abide by state laws but they are also business people and if we flaunt that OC stuff in people faces that don't understand it, then you can bet you will see a policy change at Starbucks. It is called survival.
Just makes no damn sense to OC, whether it is lawful or not. A business also has a write to disallow OC, and then we get all pissed over it and come to find out that normally it is the gun owners themselves who have pressed the issued, ...


I shudder to think of the possibilities if I could be 30 again. Don't waste it my friend.

Comment