Film: JFK to 9/11, Everything is a Rich Man's Trick.

[TheTman]

Here's a new article on the events of 9/11. http://personalliberty.com/look-what-911-has-wrought/
It's not very accepting of the official 9/11 report.

[Ikeo74]

If we don't see any new post by the T Man we'll know he was right on and they got him.

[tv_racin_fan]

Ok deal with building 7 only.

Start with theorists who claim it was brought down with explosives because it fell at free fall speed. Some of them posted some videos that supposedly show it falling at free fall speed. Trouble is in this particular instance, one of the videos shows a portion of the penthouse structure falling a few second prior to the "collapse". The only way they can claim that this video is proof that it fell at free fall speed is by ignoring the very evidence they posted.

Why would they ignore the very evidence they posted which shows that building 7 did not fall at free fall speed as they claim?

http://www.wtc7.net/videos.html watch the first video listed. Notice that the collapse took about 12 seconds, the one part of the penthouse structure falls at about the 6 second mark and the rest of the building starts to collapse at about the 12 second mark and seems to finish at around 18 seconds. Not the 6.5 seconds they claim.

Nary a one of these theorists, that I have checked out, discusses the very unique design properties of the building, yet they claim that fire has never brought down supposedly similar steel framed buildings that in fact are not similar at all. Why do they not explain the very unique properties of the building? Do they believe that the fact that there was an Con Ed sub station basically under building 7 not have any bearing on the collapse? Sure seems to me that the fact that the caissons installed in that sub station having been designed for a building about half the size of the eventual building would be interesting to discuss, especially when due to that fact they had to design a cantilever system to carry the load that those caissons could not. Sure would seem to me that a failure of part of that cantilever system could result in the eventual collapse of the building.

[Bobshouse]

How in the heck are the rich men going to pull off the big event coming on September 25th?

[tv_racin_fan]

Tman you mentioned the Gulf of Tonkin thing? What exactly do you mean? Some claim that there never was an attack on US ships there, is that what you mean sir?

[TheTman]

Yes, that Gulf of Tonkin attack was totally fabricated. I believe the Government has even admitted it. It was just another war we were manipulated into so that certain people would make a boatload of money at the expense of some 52,000 American, and untold Vietnamese and other lives. In Vietnam Russian subsidiaries supplied the North Vietnamese with a lot of war supplies. Human lives mean nothing to the bastards that get rich selling supplies to all sides of a war through their various subsidiaries in different nations. To those people, we are about like a herd of buffalo that needs thinning from time to time. The Rothchilds/Banksters/Globalist/Illiminati? whatever you want to call them. They made a killing in the world wars selling supplies to all the countries involved. They do it by having subsidiaries of companies like Ford, and Standard Oil, and other large corporations established in each of the warring countries. Go t o YouTube and look for the video 10 conspiracy theories that turned out to be true, or Google it. The Gulf of Tonkin shows up in most all of them.

[TheTman]

The Gulf of Tonkin incident, a major escalator of US involvement in the Vietnam War, never actually occurred.
It’s true. The original incident – also sometimes referred to as the USS Maddox Incident(s) –involved the destroyer USS Maddox supposedly engaging three North Vietnamese Navy torpedo boats as part of an intelligence patrol. The Maddox fired almost 300 shells.
President Lyndon B. Johnson promptly drafted the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, which became his administration’s legal justification for military involvement in Vietnam. The problem is the event never happened.
In 2005, a declassified internal National Security Agency study revealed that there were NO North Vietnamese naval vessels present during the incident. So, what was the Maddox firing at? In 1965, President Johnson commented: “For all I know, our Navy was shooting at whales out there.”
Worth pointing out: The NSA’s own historian, Robert J. Hanyok, wrote a report stating that the agency had deliberately distorted intelligence reports in 1964. He concluded: “The parallels between the faulty intelligence on Tonkin Gulf and the manipulated intelligence used to justify the Iraq War make it all the more worthwhile to re-examine the events of August 1964.”

[TheTman]

Here is something else to make your head spin. Obama and Hillary wanted Libyan Ambassador Stevens dead. He was going to spill the beans that they were transporting weapons from Libya to Turkey to be given to the Syrian rebels, and they didn't want that known. That's why the stand down orders were issued. And anyone that tried to ignore the stamd down was relieved of command by a CIA spook that was assigned to be his 2nd in command. The weapon shipments ate starting to come out, but no one dares to comment on the stand down order except for a few brave independent news agencies. MSM won't touch that one.

[JohnR]

While we're at it, how about Operation Snow?

http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/oper...ter/1110914721

[tv_racin_fan]

True according to who is the issue sir.

WTC 7 fell at free fall speed according to some. THEY have to ignore the video evidence THEY posted in order to come to that conclusion but that is the conclusion they came to. Truth according to them..